Comments: 96
LotharZhou In reply to ??? [2024-01-06 07:34:48 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 1
HinnyMule [2023-10-05 02:16:35 +0000 UTC]
π: 1 β©: 1
Endersslay [2023-04-05 15:14:16 +0000 UTC]
π: 1 β©: 1
rwodahs [2022-09-29 19:15:17 +0000 UTC]
π: 1 β©: 1
Hells33k3r [2022-02-03 10:05:26 +0000 UTC]
π: 1 β©: 1
BlackMoonZero [2016-01-25 23:18:34 +0000 UTC]
God this is amazing, I imagine the war at this time exactly like this.
π: 0 β©: 1
maty666 [2015-09-25 09:07:40 +0000 UTC]
its so intense!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
LotharZhou In reply to Stereoset95 [2015-08-09 19:35:01 +0000 UTC]
Thanks very much! Sorry for the late reply.
π: 0 β©: 0
Dkundzinsh [2014-10-22 03:17:20 +0000 UTC]
this is such a sad piece, the terrible fact of war, the lost souls fighting for politicians and bankers, not much changed.
Great piece!.
π: 0 β©: 2
Dkundzinsh In reply to LotharZhou [2014-10-22 15:00:52 +0000 UTC]
this piece of artwork really touched me emotionally, which in my book is a great success for an artist. great work sir.
π: 0 β©: 0
Techymarines [2014-04-14 15:51:52 +0000 UTC]
This picture is incredibly good, it tells a story, it almost seems like a march to death
π: 0 β©: 1
LotharZhou In reply to Techymarines [2014-04-16 22:52:10 +0000 UTC]
Thanks very much, this is the mood I hope to create.
π: 0 β©: 0
propagangjah [2014-02-12 16:14:37 +0000 UTC]
Its great!
π: 0 β©: 1
LunarKnight316 [2014-01-08 00:49:38 +0000 UTC]
The fall of an empire. I like the 'weight' it holds in this picture.
π: 0 β©: 1
LotharZhou In reply to LunarKnight316 [2014-01-08 09:36:45 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! I like the word " Weight"!
π: 0 β©: 0
eltoNNNNNN [2013-10-13 09:58:59 +0000 UTC]
very nice
π: 0 β©: 1
Pandaren-Chaplain [2013-08-19 05:30:32 +0000 UTC]
No more from sound of drum retreat,
While Marlborough, and Galway beat,
The French and Spaniards every day,
O'er the Hills and far away!
π: 0 β©: 1
PsykoHilly [2013-08-17 11:19:23 +0000 UTC]
Outstanding!
π: 0 β©: 1
DarthMandius [2013-08-16 19:26:42 +0000 UTC]
Γwesome !!! I love it !!!!!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
CrystalEnceladus [2013-04-01 09:54:52 +0000 UTC]
I could never understand why the Brits insisted on wearing bright red to battle. Sitting ducks, and yet they had an empire. It boggles the mind, considering in battle you're supposed to blend in with the background; no wait a minute; you're just supposed to stand and shoot at each other. So stupid.
Lovely sense of depth, I'm wondering who the blue guys are. French? At least they were a wee bit more sensible in their blue uniforms.
π: 0 β©: 3
Wolvercorte In reply to CrystalEnceladus [2013-04-20 13:28:34 +0000 UTC]
It was because identification. Bright colours help to recognize friend/enemy in smoke from gunpowder. Battles in 18th and part of 19th century was fought and won with line combat system, when two armies stand face to face in lines and soldiers shoot at the enemies. Rifles in that times was very inaccurate and soldiers needed a lot of time to reaload their rifles to shoot once more. And a lot of shots makes a lot of smoke, which make sometimes recognizing of another soldiers immposible without a bright colours of their uniforms.
Cheers and sorry for my bad english.
π: 0 β©: 1
CrystalEnceladus In reply to Wolvercorte [2013-04-21 06:16:57 +0000 UTC]
No worries, man, I understood you perfectly well. Those muskets were more dangerous than useful, but at least they had a spear on them. I still think it's a stupid waste of men, but then, war usually is.
π: 0 β©: 1
davidhoang0123 In reply to CrystalEnceladus [2013-08-16 12:13:10 +0000 UTC]
I'm gonna take a wild guess and say the blue lads are Americans.
π: 0 β©: 1
legendarycarcere In reply to CrystalEnceladus [2013-04-04 06:23:18 +0000 UTC]
They didnβt have rifles (musket like guns with rifleing in the barrel) they had muskets which were very inaccurate so fighting in lines and shooting volleys at the enemy was much more effective at that time. Also camouflage wasnβt need either then too, no machine guns, which started the need to blend in with the environment. Hence the reason why at the start of WWI countries easily fell to the Germans/Austrians.
π: 0 β©: 1
CrystalEnceladus In reply to legendarycarcere [2013-04-04 07:31:44 +0000 UTC]
I know about how inefficient, inaccurate and dangerous those muskets were but why hadn't anyone thought of guerilla warfare at the time? Planned properly and conducted in stages, it could have changed the course of a battle or war. When you ambush a convoy, you can shoot volleys at it and then come close with swords, daggers, the spear in the musket, and pistols. When you rely too much on a particular weapon or two, you're a dead man.
So true about the allies falling easily at the start of WW1, it took the Germans/ Austrians to garner some common sense on warfare, but the whole running at each other into machine fire is just as stupid. What a waste of men.
Pictures like this make me feel sad. It's a stupid, stupid waste. A wise chess player does not waste his pawns.
π: 0 β©: 1
Casper-viccc In reply to CrystalEnceladus [2013-04-09 13:15:17 +0000 UTC]
They didn't used guerrilla warfare en masse because it wasn't just infantry versus infantry. Cavarly watched your every move, and whenever you concentrated, artillery would bombard. Having your regiment in a loose formation against an enemy in line might seem brilliant, but you're pretty much fucked when a squadron of cavarly turns up.
π: 0 β©: 1
CrystalEnceladus In reply to Casper-viccc [2013-04-10 01:11:00 +0000 UTC]
Ah, yes, the cavarly. Keep forgetting about that. We got the Romans to thank for the cavarly...no, hang on, wasn't that Hannibal's idea?
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>