HOME | DD
Party9999999 — Decoding Racism
#african #america #american #black #brown #brutality #code #cop #crime #decode #denial #dog #eric #ferguson #garner #injustice #justice #language #law #libertarian #micheal #murder #people #police #politics #prejudice #protest #racial #racism #reactionary #republican #riots #shooting #social #society #states #united #unjust #us #usa #whistle #white #misdemeanour #conservative #political #privilege
Published: 2014-12-10 17:47:00 +0000 UTC; Views: 4794; Favourites: 46; Downloads: 15
Redirect to original
Description
Enjoy.Related content
Comments: 70
Don’t forget how these exact same people do a 180 on “the Black Card” when it’s played by a Black Republican (Candace Owens, anyone?), and by white supremacists/white supremacist sympathizers who say “Because these Black Republicans exist, racism doesn’t exist on the right, and clearly it’s the LEFT that’s racist for bringing up racism where it doesn’t exist!”, all while ignoring the concept of Boomerang Bigot.
Which roughly translates to “I don’t actually mind folks with black skin, so long as they dress, speak, and act HUWHITE!!!” (Akin to William Dudley Pelley saying that Northern Blacks are better than Southern Blacks, more or less because they had more of a WHITE character)
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Wow, you just spout crap as usual. There is anti-white racism too, dumbass.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbPYRs…
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Until you start calling out the racism against white people and racism from Jews, shut up. You're using false cause fallacies and they are invalid arguments.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Searching for anyone who says this like:
...
...
...
...search left a mystery.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sad but true.
If we cannot accept another member or group of members of our own species purely because of something as trivial as their skin colour, then how on Earth are we meant to care for the rest of the biosphere?
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
the don't play the race card too
i mean yeah there's context in sutuations.
every situation isn't automatically this or that.
it really just depends.
sometimes they are right to say "don't play the race card" where there actually IS discrimination in said situation due to race.
and sometimes it is wrong when there isn't any and someone just want to hide behind the phrase to cover up their mistakes
... or vice versa? i'm not sure i said that right.
but yes, context.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
If you are ever attacked by a minority that is shielded by political correctness, you will not, will not defend yourself in any way, period. Doing so will make you a racist, which is the very worst thing in all of existence (according to people like you).
And don’t worry, if I ever see you getting beaten to death by blacks, I’ll keep my gun in its holster and stroll along down the street, whistling a happy tune as I go so as to not offend your sensibilities.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
One thing that gets missed sometimes when talking about the shooting of Mike Brown and Eric Garner is that it isn't just about those two men. The problem is that this type of death is happening way too often, and it is happening disproportionately to black men. Once is chance, twice is co-incidence, three is a pattern... and this has happened far more than three times. When you've got a pattern like that, it's time to go looking for a reason. And I don't think the reason in this case is a pretty or just one.
I really hope you in the USA manage to reduce police brutality. It looks to me, speaking from Canada, like you've got a serious problem. I don't think ignoring it will make it go away.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
these translations seem rather accurate but a tad extreme no?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
They are all accurate, though I would agree that the first and last are definitely on the extreme side.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
i'm sorry but i disagree with you on the rioting, they destroyed the livelihoods of Innocent people and that's unacceptable, peaceful pretesting isn't passive and has been proven to work there was no reason for the riots.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The racism doesn't involve only bad white men - good black men, y'know?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I see the reality of my country in this piece....
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
All of the red ones on the left side apply to any situationew with a criminal regardless of race. I don't even CARE about race; if you're coming to my front door trying to hurt my family, I'll blast your ass.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wwwwow. you have a pretty fucked up political filter, dude. Okay, now, just as a fun excercise imagine people are human beings; with needs and wants and context you know nothing about. That people do not fall into mere classes but sub sets and cultures. That who is in power is irrelevant, what matters is who they're working for. Imagine that possibly, probably I would argue, you're patently wrong: and this is incredibly offensive to anyone with common sense.
Riots are not activism, they're flaccid spasms of public outcry. Usually resulting in the enabling of some very violent fringes of society. The Rodney King riots didn't do fuck all except make broken glass and put a few VCR's in people's houses with the price tags still on them. It's like most riots. It's endemic of outrage, but its not constructive outrage. It's alienating and degrading and on purpose. It's just a threat narrative, another us-vs.-them mania, countenanced with clubs and zip guns. www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRvPoC…
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Let's do a little deconstruction here, shall we? It's been a while since I took apart one of your nonsense riddled strawmen.
You don't like it when people put words in your mouth, right? Well, that rules CLEARLY doesn't apply to you because your intentions are actually virtuous and nobody else's can be.
For the first statement: You infer that people who say that wanted the police to use lethal force. What they actually mean when they say it is 'If this person hadn't been breaking the law, they wouldn't have gotten hurt or killed and chances are they'd say the same damn thing regardless of what race the person in question is. Everyone can agree that if these young men had obeyed the law and not beaten other people's faces to a pulp, then things would have turned out different.
This second statement, in all fairness, I'll give you half credit on. Why? Because while it is important that we talk about what happened in Ferguson, it shouldn't be the *only* thing we talk about. People are mourning a criminal and thug while a twelve year old child who took two in the chest from a rookie cop because he thought the kid's airsoft gun was real goes largely unspoken. If you want a clear-cut case of wrongdoing, there it is. But no, Sharpton and the Race Bait industry couldn't be bothered.
On the third... do you mean when you say (Not the people whose mouths you're putting words into since it was you who typed those words) that significant portion should get special treatment and consideration over everyone else? I can say with certainty that if Brown and Garner were white, not only would the grand jury make the same call, but there wouldn't even BE a grand jury case. How dare you assume you know better than each grand jury? If you want to talk about grand jury failings, then let's talk about the one that decided the police responsible for causing Eric Garner's heart to explode. However, THAT ONE WAS NOT A RACE CASE. The lead sergeant on site was a black female officer and she was right there when they were holding this fellow down. She was the leading officer on the scene. This was an unfortunate case, but it was not based in racial lines. Even Garner's wife insists it isn't. Now, while I do find the grand jury in Garner's case to be more than a little suspect in their evaluation, if they had a legitimate reason for their judgment, then we simply have to leave it at that. This was not an elected official, this was a jury of peers. Also, you sham, you seem to be particularly attached to absolutes and extremes. If someone says the riots are appalling, you're really trying to make the argument that they mean to say that aggrieved people should just shut up? You don't think they mean that they would rather the rioters be peacefully assembling? You can't be that peabrained. I refuse to believe it.
On the fourth, you infer that because things didn't go in favor of the thieving, lying, assaulting thug, that racism is to blame. And dude, there are enough examples of police misconduct in the Garner case without getting race involved. When someone says 'Don't play the race card', they mean that race shouldn't be playing a factor in the justice proceedings because it leads to things like these riots. Let the facts speak for themselves rather than try to manipulate emotions and involve an important, but in this case irrelevant issue such as ethnicity.
On this one, I have a particular bone to pick with you. 'How DARE you right wingers try to defend your home, family and business?! Those things are clearly not as important to you as killing black people!!' Riot crowds know no race, in point of fact. What I find suspect is that in you, the term rioters somehow equates to black people. Huh. Weird, that. But I digress, you seem to infer that any defense of your life, home and family constitutes racism based merely on the fact that the majority of rioters and looters are black of skin. Let's look somewhere else in the world... The Brazillian soccer riots that break out from time to time. Is it racist when people defend their homes down there? What about riots in France? Is it racist then?
I think I've said all I need to on this. This is a bad deviation and you're a bad person for spreading this kind of nonsense and for forcing words into the mouths of your opposition in the worst kind of strawman I've seen in a long time.
👍: 1 ⏩: 2
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You sir have put to words what I couldn't.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I have to admit, the murder of these men really is less important to me than cat videos. And I don't even like cat videos.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If only the world were this simple! Unfortunately, "if you're not with us, you're against us" is almost never true. Race is *never* proof of guilt or innocence.
👍: 1 ⏩: 2
True, but tell that to the racist cops...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nope, rather like 90% wrong...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I have my sense of defending my family during riots with raids and all jazz, blacks, native americans, whites, chinese, whoever it is. Do I thus fantasize about killing people? No.
And playing the race card is something left-wing people like the guy who made this art indeed do a lot. And yes, there is a race card, it is not "unreal racism". Racism exists and its a problem. But you cannot just talk about all-evil whites and their war crimes and whatever. Because that is racism as well, the very thing you are combatting.
So this "decoding racism" is more like "what would have East Germany told about the US on state television".
I hope you see my point.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm with you on defending your family, don't get me wrong, but that is not the issue discussed here.
The fact is that there's a lot of prejudice toward non-whites in USA. There's no hiding it anymore. From Trevor Martin and until now, media is exposing more and more situations where people were profiled as potential criminals only because they have different skin color. And if they objected to such treatment, they've been harassed, abused and even killed for standing up for their rights. Same as gay parades, this is their way of bringing issue to attention. Granted, it isn't right - this issue should been addressed in a different manner, but this isn't a perfect world. In fact, this shouldn't be an issue at all, at least since Rosa Parks but apparently, nobody said that to some white folks. And as long as right-wing tries to minimize the issue and sweep it under the carpet, situations like these riots will happen more and more.
So, how about you and the other white people who understand the issue make your own demonstrations - peaceful, but strong - demanding rights for your countrymen who are clearly abused? That could be a good inspiration for everyone.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thank you for your time sir 
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
uh party, racism in america is much more complicated than you think
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Actually he's white as fuck, being a native-born Brit and all that.
If it weren't for the Lefty garb, you could mistake him for an EDL thug ranting about Muslamic Rayguns.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Party, this is more complicated and convoluted than you think. I wish it where that easy, but it isn't.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I will be honest, I am white but if Ferguson (I doubt so don't start), started into a race war. I will be joining the Anti Racist side and be killing racists left and right.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And how would you differentiate racists from non-racists, exactly?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Simple, you see anyone who is a skinhead, has a tattoo of a swastika or perhaps says something racist. Therefore it is a racist.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Most racists don't wear it on their sleeve. This isn't make-believe or television.
And would you kill racists who are racists because it's how they were brought up? People who are racist because their experiences with other ethnicities were always poor?
What's the line?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I would only kill racists if a race war ever happened.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Again I ask:
How do you distinguish racists from people who aren't?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
That last point. "I fantasize about killing black people." I fantasize about killing smarmy white SJWs such as yourself that feel morally superior just because they're a white person defending the brown people. Sincerely a "brown" person. ~ C
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Absolutely true. Way to be so frank and blatant.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ah love it, this needs to be said.
God, I hate these clowns who can't see past their own noses.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I support the gun thing (Not what it "actually" means) IF it was damaging my stuff, if it aint affecting me and just bad people I won't give a shit, I think racists deserve a rake up the ass.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Against Point 1:
Black sports caster Charles Barkley said it well: "The notion that white cops are out there just killing black people -- that's ridiculous. That's just flat-out ridiculous," the TNT basketball analyst told CNN. "I challenge any black person to try to make that point. Cops are actually awesome. They are the only thing in the ghetto between this place being the wild, wild west. So this notion that cops are out there just killing black men is ridiculous and I hate that narrative coming out of this entire situation."
Against Point 2:
The dictionary defines "murder" as: the crime of killing another person deliberately and not in self-defense or with any other extenuating circumstance recognized by law.
The bulk of the evidence in the Michael Brown killing suggests that the police office fired in self-defence while Brown was resisting arrest and probably trying to kill the officer. Eric Garner was also resisting arrest and the officers where not trying to kill him, thus his death was not deliberate. So neither case was murder, by definition.
Against Point 3:
Two wrongs do not make a right. Regardless of a person's feelings about the justice or injustice represented in these incidents, riots do not help the matter. These riots are hurting black people and other minorities, increasing racial tensions, and making it harder for police and fire-fighters to do their jobs. This can only exacerbate the problem.
Against Point 4:
Most of the time I hear the race card played, it is played by a hypocrite who is more racist that the person or group being accused of racism. This is actually making the "race card" less meaningful, to the point that I have started hearing teenagers throwing it around like the latest joke. "That's racist!" I hear them say. Much like kids used to say "That's what she said!" or like the old "Yo mamma!" jokes. This is why you shouldn't play the race card at every single shadow. It is becoming like the boy who cried wolf, nobody believes it anymore.
Against Point 5:
This point makes 2 assumptions: First, that the person "getting his gun" is not black; and second, that the rioters in his neighborhood are black.
Unfortunately there is some truth to these assumptions as black people riot more often then other groups and most gun control laws are targeted against blacks, (often by targeting economic or geographical areas which are predominatly black,) to make it harder for black people to legally obtain guns. In fact, the first gun control law ever passed in the US was passed in the post-civil-war south to prevent newly freed slaves from purchasing guns.
But maybe if more black people had guns the rioters wouldn't be burning down their own neighborhoods.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>