HOME | DD

randomdinos — Dreadnoughtus schrani skeletal reconstruction.

#sauropod #titanosaur #macronarian #titanosauriform #dreadnoughtus
Published: 2018-12-20 18:35:59 +0000 UTC; Views: 23999; Favourites: 211; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description 2014's other ''largest ever'' titanosaur, albeit Patagotitan didn't have a name yet. Also a wonderfully complete animal (I'm not sure which of the two preserves a larger % of the skeleton, but the record in a single individual must be Dreadnoughtus's). Multiple sources have explained why the original mass estimate wouldn't work, notably Paul (2014) and Bates et al. (2015); a common mistake in reconstructions is to restore the torso as much too long, either based on the 3D model (which has the dorsal vertebrae disarticulated) or on the original paper skeletal, I'm not sure. Since the type was not skeletally mature, maybe adults would've reached the 26m estimate?

References:
--Hussam Zaher, Diego Pol, Alberto B. Carvalho, Paulo M. Nascimento, Claudio Riccomini, Peter Larson, Rubén Juarez-Valieri, Ricardo Pires-Domingues, Nelson Jorge da Silva Jr., Diógenes de Almeida Campos (2011). "A Complete Skull of an Early Cretaceous Sauropod and the Evolution of Advanced Titanosaurians" . PLoS ONE. 6 (2): e16663. doi :10.1371/journal.pone.0016663 .
-Lacovara, Kenneth J.; Ibiricu, L. M.; Lamanna, M. C.; Poole, J. C.; Schroeter, E. R.; Ullmann, P. V.; Voegele, K. K.; Boles, Z. M.; Egerton, V. M.; Harris, J. D.; Martínez, R. D.; Novas, F. E. (September 4, 2014). "A Gigantic, Exceptionally Complete Titanosaurian Sauropod Dinosaur from Southern Patagonia, Argentina" . Scientific Reports. 4: 6196. 
-Bates, Karl T.; Falkingham, Peter L.; Macaulay, Sophie; Brassey, Charlotte; Maidment, Susannah C. R. (2015-06-10). "Downsizing a giant: re-evaluating Dreadnoughtus body mass" . Biology Letters. 11 (6): 20150215. doi :10.1098/rsbl.2015.0215
-Ullmann, P.V.; Lacovara, K.J. (2016). "Appendicular osteology of Dreadnoughtus schrani, a giant titanosaurian (Sauropoda, Titanosauria) from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia, Argentina". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.
-www.app.pan.pl/archive/publish…

Related content
Comments: 49

DragonSlaer54 [2021-05-25 04:06:07 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

narcosaurus In reply to DragonSlaer54 [2022-08-07 13:33:39 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Anchiornisss In reply to narcosaurus [2022-10-09 10:53:09 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PigsFly1010 [2020-09-04 04:05:47 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

randomdinos In reply to PigsFly1010 [2020-09-04 16:17:20 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheLizard721 [2020-03-29 01:31:16 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

randomdinos In reply to TheLizard721 [2020-03-31 02:58:01 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, no estimates so far, unfortunately.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dinopithecus [2020-01-16 17:51:32 +0000 UTC]

That's a really massive neck. And the vertebrae look massive accordingly.

I can't help but wonder if at least some sauropods could have delivered powerful blows to each other with the top of their necks. Not with the ventral surface (with the exception of apatosaurines) or the lateral surface, but with the dorsal surface of the neck. I envisioning it looking like necking behavior in giraffes, except they're hitting each other with the top of the neck itself, not the skull (sauropod skulls are definitely not built for that). I dunno.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Thalassophoneus [2019-07-30 18:20:39 +0000 UTC]

I love that short body, the thick legs and the long, massive neck.

Still, I have the same question as with some other skeletals I have seen. Why is the neck in your version only about 9 m. long? It was originally estimated at over 11 m.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

randomdinos In reply to Thalassophoneus [2019-08-02 17:39:51 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!
Only one cervical is preserved in Dreadnoughtus, I reconstructed the length based on the neck of Malawisaurus. I believe the paper's authors used Futalognkosaurus.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Thalassophoneus In reply to randomdinos [2019-08-02 18:32:05 +0000 UTC]

Did you restore it as a 9th or a 10th cervical? Scott Hartman got a smaller neck length cause he restored it as a 10th cervical.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

randomdinos In reply to Thalassophoneus [2019-08-06 12:23:39 +0000 UTC]

I believe it was as a 9th, but I'm not sure.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Thalassophoneus In reply to randomdinos [2019-08-06 19:41:08 +0000 UTC]

Did you take cartilage thickness into account when you made this extremely short dorsal column?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

randomdinos In reply to Thalassophoneus [2019-08-07 23:16:39 +0000 UTC]

Yes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Thalassophoneus In reply to randomdinos [2019-08-08 05:25:08 +0000 UTC]

It is probably the most accurate skeletal on the internet. Could I use it as a reference for an artwork?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

randomdinos In reply to Thalassophoneus [2019-08-09 02:06:06 +0000 UTC]

Sure, just keep in mind I'll probably be updating it soon (looking at it now, the neck posture and soft tissue look kind of awkward).

But me getting dissatisfied and making a minor update happens all the time to my skeletals, so that's normal.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Thalassophoneus In reply to randomdinos [2019-08-09 04:50:23 +0000 UTC]

It doesn't really matter cause I make my drawings on pencil. I only use skeletals as guides for proportions.

Just to know, I have already used some skeletals of yours in the past. I just haven't posted the drawings.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mark0731 [2018-12-29 14:37:39 +0000 UTC]

Will you make a Paralititan skeletal/schematic someday?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

randomdinos In reply to mark0731 [2018-12-29 18:58:05 +0000 UTC]

I've tried before and the file got corrupted, maybe I'll redo it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Deform2018 [2018-12-25 03:51:37 +0000 UTC]

Really? It doesn't even crack 30 tonnes? That's odd.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

narcosaurus In reply to Deform2018 [2022-09-02 08:28:09 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

zeSmollestBirb [2018-12-23 00:20:12 +0000 UTC]

Only 27,000 kg? That's... a lot less than I expected, but it does sound more reasonable than some estimates

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

nich3860 [2018-12-22 03:59:28 +0000 UTC]

Wow, so not even reaching the size of my boi Giraffatitan ?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

randomdinos In reply to nich3860 [2018-12-22 13:51:25 +0000 UTC]

rip
It can reach HMN SII, but that's about it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

nich3860 In reply to randomdinos [2018-12-23 17:28:03 +0000 UTC]

Well to be fair , HMN SII is plenty big......

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Franoys [2018-12-21 04:43:13 +0000 UTC]

Oh my god accurate torso and head size and accurate mass. Instafav.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

randomdinos In reply to Franoys [2018-12-21 11:09:10 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Almostthere99 [2018-12-21 04:35:18 +0000 UTC]

Delicious, finally some good fucking food.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

randomdinos In reply to Almostthere99 [2018-12-21 11:09:03 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Artlover1214 [2018-12-21 04:13:40 +0000 UTC]

Dang, 27 tonnes? Wasn't this guy 50 tonnes or so?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

mark0731 In reply to Artlover1214 [2018-12-21 21:59:32 +0000 UTC]

Not since 2015: royalsocietypublishing.org/doi…

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

randomdinos In reply to Artlover1214 [2018-12-21 11:08:14 +0000 UTC]

I could see 30, but 40 and up is pushing it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dinosaurlover83 [2018-12-20 19:54:08 +0000 UTC]

Nice!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Majestic-Colossus [2018-12-20 19:51:11 +0000 UTC]

Amazing work! Such a beautiful skeletal!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

randomdinos In reply to Majestic-Colossus [2018-12-20 20:14:35 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Majestic-Colossus In reply to randomdinos [2018-12-20 21:16:03 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome! Are we getting Notocolossus soon? Very few quality skeletals of that one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

randomdinos In reply to Majestic-Colossus [2018-12-21 09:56:14 +0000 UTC]

Probably not, Notocolossus is... strange. And fragmentary, so it'd look a lot like my Patagotitan.

Perhaps a schematic in the future though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mark0731 In reply to randomdinos [2018-12-29 14:39:25 +0000 UTC]

I thought it would look more like Dreadnoughtus.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

randomdinos In reply to mark0731 [2018-12-29 18:31:43 +0000 UTC]

Nah, Notocolossus is a lognkosaur or a close relative, while Dreadnoughtus isn't.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Queen-Fopsie [2018-12-20 19:46:34 +0000 UTC]

How do those comparibly little legs hold up that monster of a neck...dinosaurs are puzzling..

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

Pendragon276 In reply to Queen-Fopsie [2018-12-20 20:34:16 +0000 UTC]

Because their legs are sturdy and columnar with their neck vertebrae being pneumatic making it proportionately lighter than one would initially think.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Queen-Fopsie In reply to Pendragon276 [2018-12-21 02:03:22 +0000 UTC]

Good to know

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

randomdinos In reply to Queen-Fopsie [2018-12-20 20:17:20 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, the other answers are right. Still looks crazy, though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Queen-Fopsie In reply to randomdinos [2018-12-21 02:02:25 +0000 UTC]

Yeah

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Majestic-Colossus In reply to Queen-Fopsie [2018-12-20 19:53:55 +0000 UTC]

That's a common question...

The neck isn't quite as heavy as it seems. The bones are very low-density. Also, most of the animal's body mass is in the torso, so it doesn't take much effort to hold that neck.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Queen-Fopsie In reply to Majestic-Colossus [2018-12-20 19:56:03 +0000 UTC]

Hm..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bh1324 [2018-12-20 19:31:35 +0000 UTC]

So it doesn't even get to 30 metric tons, poor thing keeps getting downsized. It was still a neat discovery due to it's completeness, though...

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Majestic-Colossus In reply to bh1324 [2018-12-20 21:14:44 +0000 UTC]

At least there's still the possibility that the mature ones would have weighed ~40-45t.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

randomdinos In reply to bh1324 [2018-12-20 20:18:24 +0000 UTC]

Indeed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0