HOME | DD

revengedmadness — Religious Game

Published: 2009-03-21 02:43:19 +0000 UTC; Views: 1091; Favourites: 50; Downloads: 19
Redirect to original
Description I am not saying I agree with it, but it got suggested to me by

Versions of this saying are floating all over the internet, I have tried my best to find an author to give credit to, but I haven't been able to.

So have fun with this one people!
Related content
Comments: 62

revengedmadness In reply to ??? [2010-10-10 18:23:00 +0000 UTC]

The last two are the best!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SHADOWxxxMIMZ [2009-12-05 06:00:53 +0000 UTC]

foster home of imaginary friends man.....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

revengedmadness In reply to SHADOWxxxMIMZ [2009-12-12 19:54:09 +0000 UTC]

LOL just a matter of who adopts who first right?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SHADOWxxxMIMZ In reply to revengedmadness [2009-12-13 02:51:25 +0000 UTC]

right!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FrancisWarhol [2009-05-11 00:35:47 +0000 UTC]

So true. Religions are designed to feed a need. All faiths seem to fall under me-ism.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

revengedmadness In reply to FrancisWarhol [2009-05-11 08:56:09 +0000 UTC]

I can see your point, and I am sure that it is true in some cases, but I must say I don't completely agree with it (from a personal standpoint). Thanks for the comment, I am glad you enjoyed the icon.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FrancisWarhol In reply to revengedmadness [2009-05-12 13:38:59 +0000 UTC]

You may want to check out:

[link]

Philosopher Dan Dennett calls for religion -- all religion -- to be taught in schools, so we can understand its nature as a natural phenomenon. Then he takes on The Purpose-Driven Life, disputing its claim that, to be moral, one must deny evolution.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

revengedmadness In reply to FrancisWarhol [2009-05-15 07:52:45 +0000 UTC]

That is a fascinating talk! Thank you for bringing it to my attention, I have agreed with Dennett for a while now. The only way to have a society that that is truly free religiously is to educate citizens in various world religions. That would limit the misunderstandings that are most common to all religious followers. More than that schools need to get their heads out of their asses and actually teach science. My high school wasn't even allowed to mention the name Darwin, now I don't care if the schools teach creationism too, but they need to at least teach evolution as a scientific theory.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FrancisWarhol In reply to revengedmadness [2009-05-16 05:41:54 +0000 UTC]

Glad you enjoyed Dennett's short lecture. Creationism or it's new mask "Intelligent Design" is a problem for me, though, and I (along with better minds such as Richard Dawkins) say it shouldn't be taught alongside serious science. Dawkins points out that no serious scientist today disputes evolution. Evolutionary biologist may dispute some particulars about exactly how this or that evolved. But, again, no real scientist accepts ID as a valid alternative theory. In religion classes children are taught "This is true, because this is true, because this is true." As kids we're not taught to ask "What is the evidence for this?" I think you'll enjoy conversations Dawkins has with Charlie Rose on the charlierose.com site. Just enter Dawkins in the search field. Christopher Hitchens has a lot to say about religion, too. And he's easy to find on youtube.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

revengedmadness In reply to FrancisWarhol [2009-05-16 06:56:12 +0000 UTC]

I really don't need to watch their talks, I have read multiple articles and books on the subject as well as had several classes that have covered evolution. I love Dawkins, I went to his lecture when he came through to my college. Hitchens is great, I love the way he explains to people that the joke of evolution is that there has actually been to much time (as in we don't know why there were plateaus in the evolutionary time line).
Someone you may be interested in talking to (because I have no time to do so) is . If you will go to the last comments on the poll on my page you will see exactly what I mean.

Let me just say though ... I do believe in evolution, but I have also seen and been through some things that have left me with the impression that there is a higher power. I don't know what said power is, I don't need to know. I have studied lots of different religions, I still have no clue. I border right between this and atheism.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Isabella-Elric [2009-04-22 20:00:15 +0000 UTC]

OMFG!!! THAT'S F-ING HILARIOUS!!! and totally true!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

revengedmadness In reply to Isabella-Elric [2009-04-22 21:34:40 +0000 UTC]

That is one of the best responses I have gotten! Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Isabella-Elric In reply to revengedmadness [2009-04-23 00:59:05 +0000 UTC]

lolz. your welcome. its totally true tho

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

revengedmadness In reply to Isabella-Elric [2009-04-23 02:04:41 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dante8411 [2009-03-23 22:30:48 +0000 UTC]

Curses! Yet again, something I came up with independantly has been known for years.
Though technically, it's sadder than that. Imaginary friends are on par with you. These are imaginary parents.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

revengedmadness In reply to Dante8411 [2009-03-24 02:51:01 +0000 UTC]

I find that happens a lot, because we hear it from somewhere and it sticks in our subconscious. It happens to me too, lots of my initial icon ideas are floating around the internet. Thank heavens for google so I can check them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dante8411 In reply to revengedmadness [2009-03-24 03:06:33 +0000 UTC]

Well, that does happen to everyone, but trust me, I know when I've heard something before after I see it somewhere else.
I seriously wrote Murphy's Law, Shakespeare's "Harm to heal" line, and that (among other things) on my own, then discovered that they've all basically been done.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

revengedmadness In reply to Dante8411 [2009-03-24 16:15:17 +0000 UTC]

Now I am curios what you write on your own if you re-wrote those without knowing. Well, I will have to later ... got to get to school at the moment.

Yeah, like I said a lot of my initial icon ideas have to be scrapped because I found out they are quotes by someone else. Lately I have been using some quotes, but I always cite, even when its just a topic suggestion from someone on dA.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dante8411 In reply to revengedmadness [2009-03-24 21:46:10 +0000 UTC]

Well, if you look at my profile, you may notice some stuff I write that I figure would do well on DA. My favorite is probably Evil Inc.

It really is annoying, isn't it? At least you aren't doing an ISU.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MoonlightDancer100 [2009-03-22 00:53:19 +0000 UTC]

very true! great job!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

revengedmadness In reply to MoonlightDancer100 [2009-03-22 00:55:38 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MoonlightDancer100 In reply to revengedmadness [2009-03-22 02:05:29 +0000 UTC]

welcomes

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ericnthered123 [2009-03-21 05:46:22 +0000 UTC]

OH i think i reember who said it, Lewis Black.

Awesome work by the way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

revengedmadness In reply to ericnthered123 [2009-03-21 05:58:31 +0000 UTC]

Possibly. And thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ericnthered123 In reply to revengedmadness [2009-03-21 06:07:53 +0000 UTC]

Here another good one from him about are two party system.
"Democrats party, which is a party of no ideas. And the republicans party, which are a party of bad ideas."

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

revengedmadness In reply to ericnthered123 [2009-03-21 06:11:52 +0000 UTC]

Nice.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ericnthered123 In reply to revengedmadness [2009-03-21 06:27:36 +0000 UTC]

Yes, it is.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

VeranForscythe [2009-03-21 04:10:39 +0000 UTC]

Noice! Top shelf! I love this one!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

revengedmadness In reply to VeranForscythe [2009-03-21 04:25:10 +0000 UTC]

Well I am glad you like it. Are you a George Carlin fan? He has lots of similar jokes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VeranForscythe In reply to revengedmadness [2009-03-21 07:23:03 +0000 UTC]

The name sounds vaguely familiar . . .

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

revengedmadness In reply to VeranForscythe [2009-03-21 07:46:01 +0000 UTC]

I will get you some links...
[link] (Carlin)
[link] (Penn&Teller)

I promise you both links are fabulous.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VeranForscythe In reply to revengedmadness [2009-03-21 08:06:28 +0000 UTC]

Noice!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

revengedmadness In reply to VeranForscythe [2009-03-21 08:37:29 +0000 UTC]

See! You have been missing out!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VeranForscythe In reply to revengedmadness [2009-03-21 08:48:15 +0000 UTC]

So I have, indeed. All of it is true; everything they say.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

revengedmadness In reply to VeranForscythe [2009-03-21 08:58:47 +0000 UTC]

MMHMM! The Penn & Teller Bullshit show is just awesome. And George Carlin there are hardly words.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VeranForscythe In reply to revengedmadness [2009-03-21 11:31:46 +0000 UTC]

I agree whole-heartedly!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

revengedmadness In reply to VeranForscythe [2009-03-21 22:24:05 +0000 UTC]

I figured you would love them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VeranForscythe In reply to revengedmadness [2009-03-21 23:23:22 +0000 UTC]

Oh did you now?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

revengedmadness In reply to VeranForscythe [2009-03-22 00:49:31 +0000 UTC]

Well, this icon is very similar to George Carlin's stand up, and he points out similar things in his comedy that Penn & Teller do in their show.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VeranForscythe In reply to revengedmadness [2009-03-22 05:56:35 +0000 UTC]

Are you familiar with Bill Maher?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

revengedmadness In reply to VeranForscythe [2009-03-22 06:11:36 +0000 UTC]

Somewhat. I was a fan of his show back when it was on NBC (I think).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VeranForscythe In reply to revengedmadness [2009-03-22 06:22:27 +0000 UTC]

He's hilarious in Religulous. He basically goes around dissing every religion out there while making friends with some of the believers.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

revengedmadness In reply to VeranForscythe [2009-03-22 06:25:31 +0000 UTC]

Does he diss just the religion or the people that follow the religion too?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VeranForscythe In reply to revengedmadness [2009-03-22 06:29:37 +0000 UTC]

Just the religion.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

revengedmadness In reply to VeranForscythe [2009-03-22 06:40:05 +0000 UTC]

Ok good, I may watch that soon. Who would have thought I would have had a problem if he had been making fun of people.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VeranForscythe In reply to revengedmadness [2009-03-22 06:42:41 +0000 UTC]

I dunno. Maybe you're just and oddity?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

revengedmadness In reply to VeranForscythe [2009-03-22 06:43:54 +0000 UTC]

HAHA! Well I already knew that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VeranForscythe In reply to revengedmadness [2009-03-22 06:48:33 +0000 UTC]

Guess what? I'm an oddity too! Oddities

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

revengedmadness In reply to VeranForscythe [2009-03-22 06:52:49 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mystery-of-sorrow [2009-03-21 03:30:39 +0000 UTC]

Heh, you won't be happy until you've offended EVERYone... LOL

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>