Comments: 11
Sigune In reply to joeyv7 [2014-04-18 13:03:18 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! I'm glad you like it XD!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Gryffgirl [2014-04-17 03:51:42 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful! If my memory serves me correctly, Gawain was the imaginative brother in "The Once and Future King." That depiction of St. Brendan celebrating mass on the whale is the best!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Libra1010 [2014-04-16 19:33:57 +0000 UTC]
It amuses me to imagine that the Whale in question is the cetacean equivalent of the Wandering Jew, serving penance for swallowing poor old Jonah! (also that after this St Brendan will just smile and nod whenever St Columba tries talking up how he exorcised the Monster from Loch Ness, like a big brother mildly unimpressed by his little brother's achievements).
Excellent work, by the by, Ms Sigune - it occurs to me that if ever you find yourself unwilling to think up anything TOO complicated to draw, you could use this same image of Gawain devoting himself to an account of some grand old tale told with only the very finest blarney! (changing only the image of the tale being told).
I hope that you remain well and fully trust you to keep up the good work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Libra1010 In reply to Sigune [2014-04-17 10:04:55 +0000 UTC]
You are very welcome and thank you for continuing to draw such fine Arthurian Images!
It should also be noted that the reason Sir Gawain tells tales much better than Sir Lancelot ever will is that the former gets more practice (since the Lady's Knight must keep his vocal chords supple and warmed-up so that he might continue to pursue his noble quest to save fair ladies from BOREDOM!).
I am surprised that you plan to include Sir Lancelot in your series; I must admit being possessed by the unworthy suspicion that such a fan of The Hawk of May would NEVER sully her series with that arriviste from the Otherworld!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sigune In reply to Libra1010 [2014-04-18 13:20:05 +0000 UTC]
Hahaha! Surely I can't simply ignore Lancelot altogether, just because I can't stand the man . Well, in fact I could, but I'm not going to. The thing is, I have this strange concept of time in my story. One of the things I love about the Arthurian legend is how it is a legend for all time - at least, a legend of most of our written history in the West. So whereas my story starts around the year 500, I intend to move all the way to the High Middle Ages and, depending on where I decide to end my tale, even to the early Renaissance, to acknowledge Malory. (I'm not going into the 21st century, that would be a bit much even for me ...) So it won't do to leave Lancelot aside. He is far too important to the continuation of the legend. But if all works out the way I hope it will, you will see him bring a change of atmosphere.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Libra1010 In reply to Sigune [2014-04-18 16:19:13 +0000 UTC]
I must admit that I admire your attitude; I prefer to see adaptions make lemonade out of the lemons in any franchise, rather than throw out good fruit, however bitter it may be!
It should be said that I have increasingly come to see Sir Lancelot as a good deal younger than King Arthur and Queen Guinevere, coming to Camelot as a signal of 'The End of the Beginning' in the same way that Sir Mordred's arrival betokens the 'Beginning of the End' (if I might confess a personal distortion of the original myths, I once wrote a take on Arthurian myth where Mordred took the place of Sir Gareth - partly to avoid the traditional confusion with Sir Gaheris and partly to establish Arthur's nemesis as a formidable knight in his own right, as well as not COMPLETELY Evil).
👍: 0 ⏩: 0