HOME | DD

Small-Brown-Dog — The final moments

#3d #airship #battleship #dieselpunk
Published: 2017-04-07 11:07:02 +0000 UTC; Views: 8672; Favourites: 232; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description HMAS Huntress and Henschel 293 modelled in modo
Background from the set:
All other in Photoshop

Overview:
A Henschel Hs293z radio controlled glide bomb dropped from a modified ME626 in the final moments before striking a mortal blow on HMAS Huntress.

Background story:

In 1939 aerial battleships still held place of honour and the pride of a nation. There were however, growing concerns during the the 1930’s that the quantum leap in aerial electrical applications would challenge the superiority of the aerial battleship. Others considered them obsolete as a deterrent and offensive weapon by the outbreak of the Second World War.

In 1927 The Royal Navy commissioned the first of the Predator class ships, The Huntress, followed by her sister the ship, the Tigress the following year. Huntress was laid down in early 1928 and sky launched in 1930 with final fitting out taking place over much of that year.  However, although a formidable ship of her time, the technical advancements in aero electrical applications made her obsolete in terms of speed and lifting power. Amidst much governmental uproar with regard to costs both Huntress and Tigress were grounded for special refit.

The rest of the pre-war period saw both ships policing the empire and showing up at prestigious events around the world. By the Munich crisis both ships were brought to war standard and repainted in standard camouflage although the Tigress was allowed to keep her Tiger head motif on the bow. As a marauding pair both caused some concern to the Air arm of the Kriegs marine which found most of their time devoted to defensive operations around coastal installations such as U Boat pens that were a frequent target of both Royal Navy airships.

In the meantime German company Henschel were developing a radio controlled glide bomb with a rocket engine, the Henschel 293. This weapon was air dropped from a point outside the range of accurate anti-aircraft fire and flown in by an observer who was able to maintain eye contact with the missile by means of five flares fitted to the tail or a light for night operations.

Although this missile was developed for use against light or unarmoured shipping a more powerful, prototype, the Hs 293Z, was developed for use against aerial battleships. This version had a larger explosive charge and rocket motor with an additional fuel cell to give the weapon an extra “push” in the final seconds.  It was not considered to be a main hull penetrating weapon as the armour was too thick but several weak points had been identified as being potentially damaging enough to make the breaking off of attack a wise decision by the captain. Such weak points were the bridge and other command positions, the propeller nacelles and flight control surfaces.
An ideal target was the large lift generators that protrude from the hull. Although lightly armoured the electromagnetic field on mass effect acted as a deflector. However, the field is very weak at the point where the lift unit is secured to the hull but had proved almost impossible to target precisely.

Much success had been achieved in making aerial battleships break off attack with the 88mm canon armed Me 626 Donner Vogal and a highly modified version of this aircraft was chosen to carry the Hs293z. These modifications included removing the 88mm and replacing with shackles to mount the Hs293Z and a second observer/missile guide cockpit added.

The all up weight of the ME 626 in this configuration was only slightly more than the original 88mm with a full shell magazine drum but  with no need for the recoil dampening energy storage which could now be used for additional lift and thrust. Because of its original design as an artillery class canon mount it was also a very steady gun platform making it idea in the “stand off and guide in” role.

Mixed type flights were used with a 2:1 ratio in favour of the 88mm equipped ME262. Once the HS293z was released the modified ME 626 became a fast and surprisingly agile aircraft and with 2 x 20mm canon in the nose, able to take care of itself and often protect the 88mm armed versions.

On the morning of 4th April 1942 9 ME626, 3 were carrying the Hs293z, were ordered to intercept The Huntress as she hovered off shore at 4000ft firing her main battery at the Lorient U-boat pens.
The first strikes were by 88mm armed ME626 placing shots just below the bridge and causing much internal damage.  The first Hs293z drop suffered rocket motor failure and fell into the sea. The second two missile armed aircraft dropped almost simultaneously with the pre-planned aim of placing both missiles in the same location on the steering gear.

By this time Huntress was heading for cloud cover which was quite thick in places but patchy. Both missiles were tracking well when at about the half-way point the first lost radio control. The controller of the second had to make a quick course deviation in order to avoid the first and was now low and in danger of undershooting. With main fuel and guide flares almost exhausted, the controller slammed the controls over to port and fired the booster fuel cell leaving everything else to chance.

The Hs293z came in at roughly 40 degrees from below and slammed perfectly into the mounting ring just behind the starboard rear lift generator and penetrated 18” before exploding. The explosion ripped out the capacitor conduit head mounting resulting in a massive uncontrolled energy discharge powerful enough to melt the close by bulkhead.
During the 1931 Huntress refit, the additional room required for the upgraded lift generator compartment meant that the compartment was only one bulkhead away from the rear magazine. The energy discharge vaporised the bulkhead and ignited the magazine resulting in an explosion that tore the huntress apart.

684 men lost their lives that day and the tragedy was compounded 10 days later when the Tigress fell to another Hs293z strike again on a lift generator mount but this time on the bow. Tigress came down under control and most hands were able to escape in the air life boats. Tigress was doomed before the missile strike however as several very accurate 88mm strikes had damaged her steering gear, put the bridge out of action and ruptured her main fuel oil cell.

It was the end of an era and of a story that may or may not be absolutely true to actual events of that day’s action.
Related content
Comments: 56

Small-Brown-Dog In reply to ??? [2019-08-11 09:15:29 +0000 UTC]

Appreciate that - thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ZeeZeppelin [2019-06-02 14:49:31 +0000 UTC]

What a great backgroun story! ‘Modern’ technology simply too much for the decade past capital air battleship! Well done!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Small-Brown-Dog In reply to ZeeZeppelin [2019-06-02 14:51:52 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. I would like to do more with the battleships.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZeeZeppelin In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2019-06-02 14:54:50 +0000 UTC]

Sort of the same theme of Zeppelins meeting superior technology or just combat science...I have more ideas then I have time for BUT I enjoy and appreciate your work very much!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Small-Brown-Dog In reply to ZeeZeppelin [2019-06-02 14:59:59 +0000 UTC]

In my alternative universe the technology began with the battleships although the lift generators of my aircraft was a later branch of it.
It might be nice to go back to the early days but I have several ideas I want to investigate at the monmet but don't seem to be able to get any one started

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZeeZeppelin In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2019-06-02 16:17:10 +0000 UTC]

I have more fantasies then time to develop...your designs are just amazing...I’m in awe! It’s a challenge to put my sophomoric pics together with DAZ content...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Small-Brown-Dog In reply to ZeeZeppelin [2019-06-02 16:20:23 +0000 UTC]

All it takes is practice - I have  been doing this a for a long and now. As an old dog I also have the time.
I think you will be great

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheDubstepAddict [2018-04-13 16:38:30 +0000 UTC]

I love how you incorporate real historical vehicles and ordinance into your alternate history

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Small-Brown-Dog In reply to TheDubstepAddict [2018-04-13 19:22:33 +0000 UTC]

I've been a vintage aviation freak for a long time but I like to spin something a little different but not too different just to give it a sense of - "could of been"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheDubstepAddict In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2018-04-14 01:46:30 +0000 UTC]

Nice!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheDubstepAddict [2017-11-16 04:25:09 +0000 UTC]

Verry nice, but why is the rudder on the belly? Wouldn't that be hard to land?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Small-Brown-Dog In reply to TheDubstepAddict [2017-11-16 09:40:23 +0000 UTC]

They are sky docked mostly with shore power fed to them in dock or by support lift tugs.
When they have to land for major refit or whatever the the rudder removed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheDubstepAddict In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2017-11-17 11:25:35 +0000 UTC]

But why go though that process? Why not just land wherever you want to ?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Small-Brown-Dog In reply to TheDubstepAddict [2017-11-17 11:29:22 +0000 UTC]

Because some idiot designed them with great big rudders that get int he way

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

WhovianBron3 In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2018-01-27 23:32:59 +0000 UTC]

XD Perfect.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheDubstepAddict In reply to WhovianBron3 [2018-04-13 16:39:13 +0000 UTC]

Yep

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheDubstepAddict In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2017-11-17 20:41:19 +0000 UTC]

Oj

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cullyferg2010 [2017-10-13 03:55:43 +0000 UTC]

A damn good rippin' tale!  Were the warheads on the Henschels a shape-charge type, designed to punch through armor with a jet of plasma and molten metal?  The loss of the 'Tigress' and 'Huntress' could be seen as what would have happened to the 'Akron' and 'Los Angeles' at the outset of the Pacific War with Japan.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Small-Brown-Dog In reply to cullyferg2010 [2017-10-13 08:56:38 +0000 UTC]

I think some sort of special Armour piercing warhead would have been a must. The area the Huntress was hit would be heavily armed I imagine as from that point down and under the craft would be a huge target for AA fire and so need extra. Similar to the waterline belt on surface battleships.

With Akron in mind, I was thinking on some kind of aerial aircraft carrier or similar but it has yet to get beyond an idea.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cullyferg2010 In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2017-10-13 20:26:21 +0000 UTC]

I can see the underside being heavily armored to handle AA fire.  I wonder if the Admiralty, and the ship's designers, had given any thought to armoring the upper portions of the superstructure.  That was what happened to the Hood when she faced Bismarck:  It was plunging fire through the deck that did her in, if I remember correctly.  And the thought of flying aircraft carriers might have escaped those in White Hall, though the aircraft would have to be small, agile, and able to land on the ground should the need arise.

And BTW, I came across some interesting information you might find intriguing.  While Googling Kaman Helicopters (they are an intermeshing rotor design I'm sure Charles Kaman borrowed from the Germans), I found that their K-225 helicopter, an upgrade from the initial K-125, was the first whirlybird to incorporate an gas turbine engine to drive the rotors instead of an aircraft engine!  And this was in 1951!  The US Navy bought two while the Coast Guard bought one for trials.  Always thought the French did it first.  But, there you have it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Small-Brown-Dog In reply to cullyferg2010 [2017-10-14 09:21:22 +0000 UTC]

I assume then that the engine is a turboprop with a fancy gearbox which is something that perhaps I should have looked at by now for my universe. I have been thinking on that for the next Spirit version as now I'm in the equivalent immediate post war years there is a sound barrier to crack

I have not explored the aerial battleships as much as a I might have done. It is the tech involved in their design that leads to my stuff.
You are correct re the Hood, one or more shells in an aft magazine but it seems always to be forgotten that she had landed 2 or three serious hits on Bismark. I bet this really shook the admiralty and reminded them of Jutland.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cullyferg2010 In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2017-10-14 17:22:05 +0000 UTC]

You need to use a gearbox to reduce the thousands of rpms from a turbine down the hundreds needed for the main drive gearbox that runs the main rotor and tail rotor.  Charles Kaman solved this problem with adding a small flap along the trailing edge of his rotor blades to control pitch and directional movement instead of the heavy and cumbersome set up of most helicopters.  Google Kaman and look at their history.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Small-Brown-Dog In reply to cullyferg2010 [2017-10-14 17:27:09 +0000 UTC]

In will Google that as its pretty damn cool stuff

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cullyferg2010 In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2017-10-15 01:12:08 +0000 UTC]

It saved a lot of heartache and pain in maintenance of the rotor hub and blade swivel bearings.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Small-Brown-Dog In reply to cullyferg2010 [2017-10-15 08:45:22 +0000 UTC]

Amazing engineering though.
I saw a 3d model a while back (can't remember which machine it was  from) of the rotor hub etc - the detail was incredible.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cullyferg2010 In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2017-10-15 17:59:03 +0000 UTC]

Isn't though!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

buttsqaures [2017-04-12 15:53:14 +0000 UTC]

Absolutely stunning  

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Small-Brown-Dog In reply to buttsqaures [2017-04-12 16:03:47 +0000 UTC]

Hey, thanks a lot

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

buttsqaures In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2017-04-12 16:51:07 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for the great art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DanyPrince [2017-04-07 15:48:30 +0000 UTC]

Just awesome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Small-Brown-Dog In reply to DanyPrince [2017-04-07 21:06:51 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DanyPrince In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2017-04-09 22:44:08 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zgerken [2017-04-07 11:54:43 +0000 UTC]

Awesome picture and well written if sad background story to it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Small-Brown-Dog In reply to Zgerken [2017-04-07 12:01:33 +0000 UTC]

Hi mate - glad you like it
Its largely because of Dr Zgerken and the chat we had last time about the weapon mount aircraft to use that I found this. Last year I had rendered out the Huntress and the Hs293, composited and then just seem to have left it so its thanks to you really that its done at all

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zgerken In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2017-04-07 12:24:11 +0000 UTC]

Out of curiosity, does the pilot or whoever launched such an aircraft have to control it till it hits the target?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Small-Brown-Dog In reply to Zgerken [2017-04-07 12:27:40 +0000 UTC]

No, the ME62 is modified to carry the Hs293z and also to have a second cockipt added ( like they did post war with a handful of Spifires) so an observer/missle guide can do the biz while the pilot tracks the weapon but at a safe range.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zgerken In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2017-04-07 13:25:21 +0000 UTC]

Right, sounds exactly like how the version in our world worked, so here's a way to deal with them, if you hadn't come up with a method yourself, basically use escort fighters have them operate at a range not near the flying battleship, that would allow them to spot not only the missile but the parent aircraft and force it to operate further away. Basically that or instruct ground attack aircraft to destroy all airfields near its path on the way to its target with rockets. Or bouncing land bombs.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Small-Brown-Dog In reply to Zgerken [2017-04-07 14:54:18 +0000 UTC]

Escort fighers will have a range limitation especially with airship ranges (this is 1942 and the Americans have yet to start their massed daylight raids and learn the need for escorts and need for a long range escort design). The battleships can put up a formidable air defence locally which does mean that there is really a high chance of missle detonation from AA fire although the speed of the Hs293 will be a factor and its small. The only comparison would be the V1 and the interception knowledge we have from later in the war although I would say the Hs293 is not as fast. I rather think that this was the demise of the airship as by '42 it is old tech and there is a new generation of high lift bombers on the way
Love the bouncing bomb idea although skip bombing was already in use I think by '42. How are we going to stop detonation on the first bounce ?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zgerken In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2017-04-07 15:07:41 +0000 UTC]

Have you ever studied how barns Wallis did his bouncing bombs for the dam buster raids, rather what I was thinking was using mosquitos, or their equivalents, get them to do high speed passes over the waiting aircraft and have them drop solid projectiles that bounced right through their lines wreaking the aircraft as they passed through them, you'd probably have to do this a few times. It would only be effective at dawn and dusk raids because well people won't be as awake as they would be at other times. Or you could use them to simply to bounce right into where all the missiles are stored nobody will be able to stop them as they'd get crushed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Small-Brown-Dog In reply to Zgerken [2017-04-07 15:40:29 +0000 UTC]

What a breakfast surprise that would be
Strangley, its solid projectiles I'm thinking of excellerated to a very high speed for the Zgerken gun I have in mind

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zgerken In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2017-04-07 17:24:03 +0000 UTC]

It certainly sounds interesting, plus I have plenty of weird ideas in my head, some that I should probably never verbalise for reasons that yeah, there two weird even for me, actually on high altitude bombers perhaps they modify a Mitchell design for a bomber, he had a few, I could certainly see it work. Hang on just got another brain wave!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Small-Brown-Dog In reply to Zgerken [2017-04-07 21:05:09 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zgerken In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2017-04-07 21:24:14 +0000 UTC]

Would you like to hear it? And if so have you heard of Firefox?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Small-Brown-Dog In reply to Zgerken [2017-04-07 21:26:06 +0000 UTC]

Yes I would and the only Firefox I know is either a web browser or fictional Russian aircraft Clint Eastwood stole

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zgerken In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2017-04-07 21:40:04 +0000 UTC]

Well my idea has bearing on the book that the film clint Eastwood stole it is based upon, my idea is that one of the Horton brothers wasn't as loyal to the third Riech as he proclaimed rather he saw the way the wind was going and decided to defect to allies. Along with their Amerika bomber, which along with the anti grav tech, thanks to your world, is much more agile and stronger, the bare bones are he and a group of like minded individuals make an agreement with the U.K. steal the aircraft give them RAF colours and fly to Scotland with none of the other allies the wiser. Since a the Germans had no idea where they had gone, b the Russians where busy searching for enemies that didn't exist and c the Americans where we'll too busy with the nuclear bomb. There is more but the bare bones is that he succeededs, destroying all unbuilt aircraft back at base and taking the drawings with him and conveniently taking a very dangerous weapon out of Hitlers hands as well as keeping the Horten stealth fighter, which is more deadly in your universe, out of his hands. There is more but it may not make sense if I keep talking here.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Small-Brown-Dog In reply to Zgerken [2017-04-07 21:54:06 +0000 UTC]

You may need to get out more because you are sounding more like me 
I have looked at the the Horten and drooled but stayed away from it in my time line/universe because it would be perhaps just too awesome and pretty well covered in 3D modeling. Basically its bacause there is so much already done that I started my own designs ... plus its a whole lotta fun finding out about stuff

The Horten brother defection is an interesting storyline all round, you should develop this as there are several angles to look at it from within the base plot .. this is cool.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zgerken In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2017-04-07 21:59:16 +0000 UTC]

Glad you like it, by the way the above splurge of words was natural me, I may not look it but I'm a very big military nut, do you have any suggestions to help to develop it, I wouldn't mind I like bouncing ideas off others, it can be very interesting.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Small-Brown-Dog In reply to Zgerken [2017-04-07 22:10:23 +0000 UTC]

Well you would get a chance to build say 4 very different characters from different backagrounds, political beliefs, ethics and so on. Perhaps two could be very similar, friends even in another life but just happen but at this time are on different sides. Then there is the tech side to research and play with ... could be involved but rewarding. If this sort of thing is natural Zgerken then let it flow, take the brakes off and to hell with it. Get it all out and have some fun. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zgerken In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2017-04-08 08:26:07 +0000 UTC]

Fair enough, I'll have to put some thought to it, it would also need a cool battle scene, something like four or five of aforementioned bombers with spectres fighting over the English Channel against not only the FW 320 was it? And Me 262's, that would make a cool battle scene which the story would happily explain what German lookin aircraft are doing fighting other German aircraft. Hmmmmmm. I'll have to think of a way to condense it down so it doesn't sound well stupid or just too complicated.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Small-Brown-Dog In reply to Zgerken [2017-04-08 08:34:49 +0000 UTC]

You may find yourself reducing to the basic components and then, when you start fleshing it out, it starts to grow into a monster

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>