Comments: 27
arfgard [2018-01-30 04:09:10 +0000 UTC]
Would have been a better movie without that damned Celine Dion song, though .......
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cullyferg2010 [2017-12-14 05:32:16 +0000 UTC]
All you can do is muster the crew on deck, give a brief eulogy to the crew lost onboard, throw a wreath into the waves, then head home. And never give away her position, period!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
jncarter [2017-11-24 13:52:37 +0000 UTC]
That's a great idea and very well done too. Love it
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Leewom [2017-11-18 14:47:05 +0000 UTC]
Fantastically atmospheric Dad.
Nice one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BillyNikoll [2017-11-13 08:57:21 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Alphazede [2017-11-11 03:45:04 +0000 UTC]
What is this ship ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
epiloguest [2017-11-11 01:35:53 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful. Both picture and story.
Now I'm intriqued to know how the anti-grav technology has progressed on those +30 years. Even if big airships are not useful as a weapon, i wonder if the concept found it's new home in the civilian marked.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Pachumaster [2017-11-11 01:03:12 +0000 UTC]
the biggest tragedy was reading how no combat airships remained to the modern day.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Small-Brown-Dog In reply to Pachumaster [2017-11-11 09:57:11 +0000 UTC]
Not on the scale of the Predator class.
Similar to reality where we don't build battleships anymore. The tech would be still in use and something I need to investigate is airborne aircraft carriers. Then there is commercial shipping.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Pachumaster In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2017-11-11 11:31:07 +0000 UTC]
For the question of commercial shipping and airborne carriers I can give you a leg up since I'm in a group that is centered almost entirely on scy-fy airship combat, so we discussed this a lot.
In this setting they do not have air to air (guided) missiles, so combat is done with machineguns,bombs and 'anti-airship rockets' wich are the equivalent of torpedoes but for airships
In traditional dogfighting height advantage plays a large role, as being higher gives one an easier time aming and ne can covert that potencial energy into kinetic by putching down (but I'm sure you're familiar whith all this) an airship-carrier means that your planes get to deploy from an altitude, lowering reaction time. furthermore ,you get a mobile airstrip that can operate over land. This does not actually help the fuel efficiency of your planes since they need to climb back up to the carrier.(unless it's reconnosance or high altitude bombing, then you're spared from having to deal with the lower, soup-ier atmo)(unless you lower the altitude of the airship, but that's just inefficient)
Obiously it needs to house a fighterwing so that would up the size, making it a bigger target(big ship might be good for power projections, if you're the fuhrer and want to show off your wonderweapon), and the fighters, while off, are a lot of dead wheight.
Advantages of using carriers over destroyers are basically those of planes. That the carrier itself can keep out of the range of the enemy weapons, that the aircraft can deliver ordenance with more presition and that the planes are faster so they can go in and out of combat more effectively (the value of this depends on how much you value the lives of your pilots)
As for civilian market you just have to take into account fuel efficiency, speed and your ability to store perishable goods.
The might have adavantages over land transport in that they need no rails or roads.
One area where they would always be used, however, is cruise liners. Think about it, all the confort of a cruise...*in the sky*!
Would make for a nice target for a terrorist attack too.
Give them the ability to land and they can serve as mobile hospitals, troop and vehicle carriers, armored vehicle recovery craft or ambulances (like a helicopter!)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Pachumaster In reply to Small-Brown-Dog [2017-11-12 15:33:25 +0000 UTC]
tech development is kind of iffy. they are good at chemistry, balistics, metalurgy, and therefore rocketry, but poor understanding of electomagnetic waves is keeping them away from infrared, low light vision, etc. they use cathode tubes but they understand them more as a función of magnetism than as a flow of electrons (they don't have colour TV).
after some back and forth on preasurization we came to the conclusion that:
-crew compartments, kitchen, dining area, etc. and the bridge would be preasurized
-but the crew would wear preasurized suits in combat stations.
-parts of the ship that are expected to have people running back and forth would not be preasurized as dealing with airlocks would be too cumbersome
-compartments that are expected to get hit by enemy fire would not be preasurized so as not to deal with decompression.
-the space in between hulls (if they have spaced armour) *might* be preasurized.
I was managing a space program to study cosmic radiation but a civil war broke out last week and I've established martial law. I'll be shelling a beach landing by foreign invaders from a wonder weapon airship on my soil in a week and tomorrow I'll be surgically striking the rebels on my space center.
fun times...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TSofian [2017-11-10 19:12:25 +0000 UTC]
Man that is so sharp!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2