Comments: 42
MEGslayer [2013-10-01 02:40:57 +0000 UTC]
why did you stop doing these?!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MakaioMikaele [2012-07-23 20:35:27 +0000 UTC]
That is awesome! A flower dragon! Keep up the awesome artwork!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IanMelbourne93 [2009-08-08 06:02:41 +0000 UTC]
great concept, i love it
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
magpiesmiscellany [2009-02-27 02:28:08 +0000 UTC]
Really cute, and I like your description. I'm not good with manips, so no ideas there for you. Drawing-wise, I'd say maybe a bit more shading at the edge of the far wing and back might make it blend in tonally with the background photo. I like the idea of this guy. I hope you do a series.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
blicks23 [2008-11-03 18:47:04 +0000 UTC]
It's amazing, but you can shade between the toes and legs to make it look more 3D!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sphenacodon In reply to blicks23 [2008-11-04 07:55:58 +0000 UTC]
Thanks!
I'm still getting used to combining photoshop and traditional art. I agree, the feet look flat compared to the rest of the animal. Something for next time, then...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
thomastapir [2008-04-04 18:53:23 +0000 UTC]
Very pretty, and I LOVE the conceptual background! The head and "wings" are my favorite parts. I think the integration into the photo works fairly well in terms of the sense of how the mass of the animal is situated on the branch or beam; that shadow beneath the creature is very successful. The background landscape slightly out of focus also really helps. My only suggestion might be to take a look at the disparity in value between the creature and the background, and perhaps punch up the shadows on the underside of the volumes of the creature's body turned away from the light to give further dimensionality to the creature's forms. On the other hand, the creature has a really nice luminosity to it, and I wouldn't want to see you sacrifice that. Perhaps the background could be lightened instead? Anyway, these are all secondary issues...it's a beautiful piece overall!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sphenacodon In reply to thomastapir [2008-04-05 07:08:57 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the feedback! I did feel that the animal was very bright as compared to its background, but I uploaded it anyway to get some critiques.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
thomastapir In reply to Sphenacodon [2008-04-06 06:15:44 +0000 UTC]
The funny thing is, the longer I looked at it the more natural it seemed...I actually had second thoughts about my comment after I posted, thinking I was being too hasty, but if you had the same impression then maybe it was worth mentioning. I try to go with my first gut reaction in terms of critiques, because it usually pays off when I take that approach to my own art.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sphenacodon In reply to thomastapir [2008-04-06 07:36:53 +0000 UTC]
No problem, it's a good idea to critique first and ask questions later...
I still say it's bright though. When I remove my glasses to look at it unfocused, the animal stands out a lot from its surroundings. Which may or may not be a good thing, but that's how I saw it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
nemo-ramjet [2008-04-04 17:20:17 +0000 UTC]
Very nice work... The fictitious ecology is also well- thought out! Were you inspired by simillarly flower-faced batavian ur bats and rhinogrades?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
nemo-ramjet [2008-04-04 17:15:15 +0000 UTC]
Very nice work... The fictitious ecology is also well- thought out! Were you inspired by simillarly flower-faced batavian ur bats and rhinogrades?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sphenacodon In reply to nemo-ramjet [2008-04-04 18:51:56 +0000 UTC]
Actually, this started out as a parody of those sweet "faeries" (gad, I hate that term) always flitting around flowers. I thought the idea of giving them a natural predator was loopy enough. I was further inspired by the orphyx, a species of animal that appears in Le Grand Pouvoir Du Chninkel by van Hamme and Rosinski, and which looks like the unloved child of a dragon and an orchid. The rhinogrades and ur-bats came in last.
This may or may not become a series, depending on how much time I have on my hands...
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
nemo-ramjet In reply to Sphenacodon [2008-04-06 10:22:33 +0000 UTC]
Really cool... Faeries, Dragons and Tolkienesque assemblages of elves, orcs and dwarfs are among my least favorite imaginary beings too...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sphenacodon In reply to nemo-ramjet [2008-04-07 05:36:49 +0000 UTC]
Yup, they've been overdone ad nauseam. But dragons have the potential to be endlessly cool, given the freedom one has in doing them. As long as it's vaguely lizardy, it's a dragon.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
thomastapir In reply to Sphenacodon [2008-04-04 18:56:02 +0000 UTC]
I'd love to see more! It reminds me of one of my all-time favorite fantasy creatures, the Butterfly Dragon, as illustrated by Mark Ferrari in S. Petersen's Field Guide to the Dreamlands, a Call of Cthulhu RPG supplement.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sphenacodon In reply to thomastapir [2008-04-05 07:11:09 +0000 UTC]
There's much potential for diversity here, what with all the flowers in the world.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
thomastapir In reply to Sphenacodon [2008-04-06 06:10:29 +0000 UTC]
Oh, no doubt...I would love to see your take on an orchid or iris dragon. Or how about a pitcher plant or Venus' flytrap? Watch out for those teeth! I was working on a planet of plant/animal symbionts a while back, ala Brian Aldiss' "Hothouse." Man, this makes me want to get back to work on it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sphenacodon In reply to thomastapir [2008-04-06 07:39:37 +0000 UTC]
Venus flytraps are monstrous to begin with!
I had already pictured a sauropod-like saguaro dragon, lined with prickles; a pachydermous rafflesia dragon; a serpentine pitcher-plant dragon... They seem to work best with tropical flowers.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
thomastapir In reply to Sphenacodon [2008-04-07 05:51:27 +0000 UTC]
Oh man, those all sound so cool...I want to see the saguaro dragon, just because it's the hardest for me to picture. Are you imagining dorsal spines, or maybe something like Saltasaurus...?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EmperorDinobot [2008-04-04 07:59:42 +0000 UTC]
Wow, that's beautiful.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1