Comments: 14
FreddyC [2011-09-11 12:40:57 +0000 UTC]
I think I'll give some technical tips.
I'm not sure if you meant for the guy on the right to be blurred, but if you want a for steady shot, you can increase the ISO. I see you have it on ISO400, but for this kind of environment, unless I want everything blurred, I would go to ISO1600 at least.
Of course, you can use flash as well.
I would be interested in what story or purpose, in your view, this picture represents. Usually, that is the raison d'etre for a photojournal picture.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pyro-tom [2011-09-08 16:04:55 +0000 UTC]
The composition is probably the only good thing about this image. The quality is somewhat lacking i.e. the street lights are too bright, the colours are dull, the depth of field is pretty huge and the focusing is not there.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pyro-tom In reply to thetawave2 [2011-09-08 16:17:43 +0000 UTC]
A flash gun gives you more control of the lighting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
thetawave2 In reply to pyro-tom [2011-09-08 16:20:01 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the tip! I'll have to look into that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
thetawave2 In reply to haneiy [2011-09-08 12:00:08 +0000 UTC]
Thanks very much for the detailed and thoughtful comment!
The people in the foreground are definitely intended to be a focal point of the picture. The parliament building in the background is, I think, another important focal point, since the Greek political atmosphere and the voting and policymaking going on in that building is the reason that the people are there. I think having both foci in the image, especially ones so thematically relevant, is important here.
I found your comment about "relief over the crowd" very interesting. The back of the protest was really a breath of fresh air after being in the thick of it all! I think a tighter composition would have been appropriate to being more in the midst of the action, but I think some space was appropriate to this image, where the viewer surveys what's going on without really being a part of it.
Again thank you very much. I really liked what you had to say about my piece.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
thetawave2 In reply to haneiy [2011-09-08 12:13:18 +0000 UTC]
haha yeah I suppose so. Although doesn't that kind of emphasize their connection?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
haneiy In reply to thetawave2 [2011-09-08 12:21:04 +0000 UTC]
the vertical axis would emphasize their connection but also distract the viewer and possibly bore the viewer since everything is very symetrical this way.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
thetawave2 In reply to haneiy [2011-09-08 12:37:31 +0000 UTC]
I see what you mean.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
thetawave2 In reply to Mikemeadows91 [2011-09-06 12:28:21 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the comment! I really appreciate the input.
This was really a quick snapshot, as I didn't want to hold my camera up for extended periods of time in the middle of the demonstration. But I think a lower vantage point would have let me capture less of the crowd. I guess I could have taken a little off the top by tilting the camera down but I think I was trying to prevent the image from looking too crowded and cluttered. If I could do it again, I think I would tilt the camera down a little like you suggested, but I don't think I'd cut out more than a quarter of the sky.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0