HOME | DD

thomastapir — Pteroskate

Published: 2008-03-21 06:25:07 +0000 UTC; Views: 2688; Favourites: 60; Downloads: 37
Redirect to original
Description …Or is it a Rajidaustro? Concept for this creature was a pterodaustro-like filter-feeding pterosaur that’s adopted a flightless, aquatic lifestyle and is converging on a ray-like body design. The pink coloration is from shellfish dyes, just like a flamingo. I was thinking that the elongated hind toe may have evolved into a venomous spur, like that of a platypus, thus providing an analog to a stringray’s barb. The rings on the tail might then be a warning to predators.

I could see this one falling into the “directed panspermia” category--perhaps a World o’ Pterosaurs, where only the flying reptiles were transplated from Earth to see how they would radiate into the different environmental niches over the following millions of years…Kind of like Dougal Dixon’s “Islands of Batavia” on a planetary scale. I like the idea of humans migrating out into space and encountering these odd “alternate Earths” scattered across the galaxy, hundreds or thousands of years from now.

Notes on the art: yes, he’s in the water, not flying over it; I just didn’t want to sacrifice image clarity for a more realistic water effect. I tried that with the Elasmomorph and it didn’t work anyway. : P I don’t use colored pencils very often, but I pictured these guys retaining a fur-like integument (at least at this stage in their evolution), and I felt the pencils would provide that “soft” texture I was going for. I’m not sure if it succeeded, but I think I prefer this effect to what I’d generally get with watercolors.

And just because I have a sinking feeling I’m going to get comments about it, this guy is looking over his shoulder. No, dorsal views aren’t my strong suit. : P
Related content
Comments: 18

Dylan613 [2018-01-16 18:15:32 +0000 UTC]

Hi. Does it give birth to live young or does it have to go onto land and lay eggs? I'm curious.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thomastapir In reply to Dylan613 [2018-01-23 05:03:50 +0000 UTC]

Hmm, good question...This one could go either way, but I'm thinking it probably gives birth to live young.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PeteriDish [2014-03-09 21:28:36 +0000 UTC]

wow yes. very bizzare indeed!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

montodeflino [2012-08-07 02:19:21 +0000 UTC]

I envy any artist Who could draw even semi realistic water ,nice job I see you got alot talent

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thomastapir In reply to montodeflino [2012-08-07 22:49:41 +0000 UTC]

Thanks very much for your kind words, I really appreciate it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Michelle56 [2008-06-30 00:04:14 +0000 UTC]

Oooh very interesting!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thomastapir In reply to Michelle56 [2008-06-30 01:18:23 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! And thank you for the fave, it's much appreciated!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Rodlox [2008-03-22 07:57:01 +0000 UTC]

you did a dorsal view far better than I could've, rest assured of that (at least)

I rather like this creature. very interesting and fine concept, well-executed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thomastapir In reply to Rodlox [2008-03-22 16:41:26 +0000 UTC]

Thank you sir! The dorsal view doesn't look that bad to me in retrospect, though I struggled with it at the time. It's a little more ambiguous in some of my simplified "Pteroray" sketches that never got rendered up as paintings.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rodlox In reply to thomastapir [2008-05-30 18:39:09 +0000 UTC]

looking forwards to more. ...whenever you do do more of 'em.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

nemo-ramjet [2008-03-21 15:11:38 +0000 UTC]

Funnily enough, some early palaeontologists envisioned pterosaurs exactly this way - they couldn't conceive that a "reptile" could fly...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thomastapir In reply to nemo-ramjet [2008-03-21 15:41:50 +0000 UTC]

I just flashed on an old ink drawing from the 19th century that showed exactly such a reconstruction...I'd forgotten about that!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

nemo-ramjet In reply to thomastapir [2008-04-02 19:52:29 +0000 UTC]

funny ideas back then... a lot of them!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thomastapir In reply to nemo-ramjet [2008-04-03 16:32:06 +0000 UTC]

Some great inspiration to be had in those old inaccurate restorations...Some of them are so off-base that they are actually better inspiration for alternate timelines or fantasy creatures than for dinosaurs. I collect old kids' dinosaur picture-books for exactly this reason, and it's why I appreciated your David Peters pterosaur so much. I've got a few ideas in the works based on outdated dino concepts, so I may have some pieces along these lines soon! : )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

nemo-ramjet In reply to thomastapir [2008-04-06 10:31:41 +0000 UTC]

Retro-palaeo sounds like so much fun... I wouldn't be surprised if it became a fad these days

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sphenacodon [2008-03-21 09:35:54 +0000 UTC]

Interesting concept... do these guys go on land to lay their eggs?
However, I don't think pterosaurs would be very likely to take to water, given that none did during the whole Mesozoic era (whereas birds produced aquatic forms early on, such as Hesperornis).
It's still a great idea, though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thomastapir In reply to Sphenacodon [2008-03-21 15:48:13 +0000 UTC]

I hadn't really decided on that (viviparous versus ovoviviparous)...I was kind of leaning towards eggs retained internally until hatching, but the more I look at this guy the more I'm thinking it is still fairly early in its evolution back towards the water...Which is too bad considering my original concept was for something fully martine/aquatic. : / So anyway, perhaps s/he does return to land for nesting.

Maybe these guys needed a transgenic nudge to get them into the water. ; ) Thanks for the feedback!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sphenacodon In reply to thomastapir [2008-03-21 16:04:48 +0000 UTC]

There aren't any archosaurs that give birth to live young. It would be a safe bet to assume that marine pterosaurs go on land to lay their eggs - at least at this stage in their evolution.

A bit of genetic tweaking wouldn't hurt.
You're welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0