Comments: 39
anonygrazer [2016-11-10 09:47:49 +0000 UTC]
I like your picture AND your story line - unique!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Bnspyrd [2011-05-05 02:39:40 +0000 UTC]
You have been featured here > [link]
STEAMPUNK AQUATIKS CONTEST inspired
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LuvLoz [2009-07-14 02:48:25 +0000 UTC]
Wow, that tail is amazing! I agree that it looks so much better because the steampunk aspects are there for a reason.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LeeAnneKortus [2009-06-16 20:29:50 +0000 UTC]
Fantastic work!! She looks very dangerous and beautiful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
vhartley [2009-04-06 17:29:40 +0000 UTC]
This is a really intriguing mermaid design. I love the spiny fins that you've given her and the way the plates of metal on her fin are shaped a bit and overlap like scales over her own.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
HiddenRelevance [2009-03-24 15:03:51 +0000 UTC]
Oh this is fabulous! I love the way you added the steampunk details without some of the cliches.. it's very well done!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Masasasaki [2009-03-24 01:05:00 +0000 UTC]
Wow, this is awesome! Great work! I love it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Aelanessa [2009-03-23 21:48:58 +0000 UTC]
I really love the tail design! She looks quite dangerous..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
moshunman [2009-03-23 04:03:05 +0000 UTC]
nice
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
otenba-kun [2009-03-23 02:34:28 +0000 UTC]
That looks really nice! I especially love her tail!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ShatteredSwords [2009-03-23 00:49:40 +0000 UTC]
Your starting sketch did not do her justice! This is beautiful! I love how fine her hair is and how her tail has those lovely flashes of scale. I certainly much prefer it to my thus far digitally coloured mermaid ^_^ - Eliza
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nehemet [2009-03-23 00:45:47 +0000 UTC]
I approve!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
arcticphoenixstudios [2009-03-22 23:06:25 +0000 UTC]
I like the spread of her tail. Not sure what to think about how the pole ends though....feels a tad awkward.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
windfalcon In reply to arcticphoenixstudios [2009-03-23 03:05:48 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! Though which poles? The ends of each 'fin'? I was trying to have them fade a bit into the depths of the sea.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
arcticphoenixstudios In reply to windfalcon [2009-03-26 06:23:09 +0000 UTC]
^.^
Oh...right...the largest one pointing down to her hips. The fade feels a tad fast for the angle of the pole. I sort of guessed that was your intention, but it's the angle/direction of the fade that makes it look a little strange. I almost want to say that it might make more sense that there's more detail near her, where the light is and have it fade off to the right where the light drops off. If it were fading into the distance, it should be darker rather than lighter like how you have the water gradated at the bottom...unless of course there was another shaft of light coming down further back that would highlight the pole. Still, there would be darker waters in between. Hopefully that makes sense and I've not rambled too much? Lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
windfalcon In reply to arcticphoenixstudios [2009-03-31 02:34:27 +0000 UTC]
Ah! You mean the wooden poles of the ship (sorry, I don't know ship terminology). I was aiming for a feeling of depth, since in the sea (especially farther down) things tend to fade quickly as they head away. Things that go farther back tend to get lighter with less contrast (atmospheric perspective), though I'm not entirely sure how that would happen underwater. I figured maybe the water was a bit murky (since a ship just sank and there's probably stuff in the water. Though perhaps I should have given it a bit more definition.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BirthofaStar [2009-03-22 22:39:52 +0000 UTC]
Bravo! A lovely piece...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
windfalcon In reply to Verdokai [2009-03-22 22:06:40 +0000 UTC]
Heheheh ironically, my friend has been ranting about all the steampunk art/clothes/etc that have been more simple Victorian-with-technology rather than 'steampunk.' Goggles are fun and all, but I thought, "why would a mermaid need goggles? She's designed to be self-sufficient in the sea." I figured the tail-decorating thing would fit with the whole 'mermaid finding pretty things to adorn herself with.'
And underwater electricity would be interesting indeed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jirakotsu [2009-03-22 21:58:01 +0000 UTC]
I've heard gouache is nice to paint with. c:
Well, anyway, the details were amazing, but in the piece it's even better 8D
I love the pose and all the objects and things...scales...and stuff. c:
Well done :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
arcticphoenixstudios In reply to Jirakotsu [2009-03-22 23:05:48 +0000 UTC]
I've heard good and bad about gouache. It's called opaque watercolour for a reason and some people hate that quality about it. I like it for that quality. I will usually mix it with watercolour though. Not together, but use both on the same painting.
The downside of gouache for me (or at least the stuff I have) is that it comes off more easily if it gets wet and isn't supposed to. It's also more powdery than watercolour.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Marker-Guru In reply to arcticphoenixstudios [2009-03-23 18:36:41 +0000 UTC]
sorry to intrude but I hope you find this interesting:
you can use an acrylic gouache if you want it to be permanent. there are 2 types of gouache, acrylic and gum arabic based. the gum arabic is more like watercolours and the acylic based is opaque and matte, and compares more to a fluid acrylic. once it dries, its permanent.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jirakotsu In reply to arcticphoenixstudios [2009-03-22 23:14:26 +0000 UTC]
Ah, I see. Well, I'd certainly enjoy trying it, just to see how it plays out. I've never been good with colours, so I'm not sure 8D;;
Gouache seems to be nice if wet, yes, because you can easily repaint over a messy part or something >3<
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Jirakotsu In reply to windfalcon [2009-03-22 22:30:01 +0000 UTC]
You're very welcome! :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0