Comments: 40
Davinci975 [2022-05-07 21:51:00 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LeDorean [2020-09-23 05:09:20 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bagera3005 In reply to LeDorean [2020-09-23 05:16:37 +0000 UTC]
I’m going to do high raz one over winter
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Alpha-Squid [2014-05-08 13:03:22 +0000 UTC]
AWESOME!!!!!!! FAVE!!!!!!!!!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
med8tr0n [2014-01-29 18:28:21 +0000 UTC]
Nice, I did a few out of paper but I haven't put any on my page yet, like what you've done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BosquianDeathAce [2013-09-29 23:43:35 +0000 UTC]
Caterpillar type propulsion
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AstroFox624 [2012-09-22 04:26:10 +0000 UTC]
Hiya baby, she's quite a beauty!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ralph1989 [2012-05-31 16:47:45 +0000 UTC]
I see only 20 missile tubes. Red October had 26 × RSM-52 ballistic missiles.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ColonialChrome In reply to bagera3005 [2014-04-08 12:58:36 +0000 UTC]
Ralph is quite correct. Simply changing the scale later won't change that this is not the October. This is no different from doodling a DeLorean and insisting it's Doc Brown's DeLorean, or a green van and saying it's the mystery machine.
Think you really ought to be clear that this is the (significantly erroneous) movie model rather than the Red October as described in epic detail by Clancy.
Just in summary...
October is 12 meters longer, and 3 meters wider than a Typhoon. She holds 6 additional Seahawk SS-N-20 missiles. Her tunnel drive doors are circular, fore and aft and are coaxial through the hull. Neither October nor Typhoons carried a towed array pod on the tail - this could be ignored if it weren't a plot point in the film (and book) that she does NOT carry one - it's why she performs Crazy Ivan turns - to look behind her, which a submarine with a TSA does not have to do). Typhoons and October have dive planes behind shrouded propellors, the chopped beavertail you show here never set sail. October is the seventh ship to sail, and as such would feature the advanced side looking sonar that ran most of the length of the hull (you seem to show it as possibly hull plating, whereas it's a rectangular bulge) plus the LIHF sonar array on the nose. You've got the forward escape hatch marked, but not the rear one, it'd be both either way.
You also seem to have omitted the attack periscope, though this could simply be retracted.
Most features are not in parallel between the side and plan elevations either.
I guess after years of rattling this stuff out you've still not garnered an interest in research or accuracy. C'est la guerre.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DrBenzer [2012-04-09 12:25:31 +0000 UTC]
his is great art really like it. I have read red storm rising and it great work but have not got to hunt for red October. I have seen the movie really liked that. again great work
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
eddievhfan1984 [2011-12-11 14:58:00 +0000 UTC]
Great detail, dude.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Lex-the-Pikachu [2011-01-29 13:57:47 +0000 UTC]
awesome drawing, i loved that movie
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BlacktailFA [2010-02-15 05:53:06 +0000 UTC]
The bitter irony of the whole plot basis (the Red October's propulsion system) is that it ignores the single loudest component of a Nuclear Submarine's propulsion system --- the Nuclear Reactor itself!
Observe;
[link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ARAJediMaster1138 In reply to BlacktailFA [2012-02-17 16:47:07 +0000 UTC]
I'm not sure; does the submarine need a nuclear reactor to keep its engines going or what? I think that they when the caterpillar drive was activated, they would have shut off the reactor and let the silent drive do the work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BlacktailFA In reply to ARAJediMaster1138 [2012-02-18 06:13:41 +0000 UTC]
Shutting down a nuclear reactor takes a LONG time, and getting it going again takes even longer --- plus, you have to have a cooling system with all sorts of pumps and other plumbing running at all times one way or another, just to keep the thing from melting down.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ARAJediMaster1138 In reply to BlacktailFA [2012-02-18 06:32:43 +0000 UTC]
But does the reactor power the engines? Are there other systems that rely on its power?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BlacktailFA In reply to ARAJediMaster1138 [2012-02-18 09:06:51 +0000 UTC]
The reactor is basically a Steam Boiler --- it boils steam that drives Steam turbines, which either charge the batteries, drive the screw(s), or both. The turbines are an additional source of noise.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ARAJediMaster1138 In reply to BlacktailFA [2012-02-18 16:36:22 +0000 UTC]
And the batteries power everything else on the ship; right? Lights and whatnot; every bit of electrical equipment the sub would need? And without it, everything does dead.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BlacktailFA In reply to ARAJediMaster1138 [2012-02-18 23:52:17 +0000 UTC]
That's the idea. Subs also have alternators attached to their powerplants that generate electricity while they're running, but most of the time they get their power from batteries.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ARAJediMaster1138 In reply to BlacktailFA [2012-02-19 00:31:13 +0000 UTC]
Okay, but here's the big question; would the reactor be actually heard at all? If so, then perhaps in the story, an experimental reactor could have been built to reduce the noise it would have made normally and a design flaw in could have been exploited by Ramius to prompt the crew off of the vessel; something that wouldn't produce too much radiation, but enough. If the reactor isn't heard anyway, then Mr. Clancy wouldn't have to worry with that issue, would he?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ian7842 [2010-02-14 01:54:08 +0000 UTC]
red october... like the witch from Freedom Force
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bagera3005 In reply to ian7842 [2010-02-14 02:04:07 +0000 UTC]
no like the sub from movie an the knight of long knifes
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ian7842 In reply to bagera3005 [2010-02-14 02:07:22 +0000 UTC]
oh yeah! the witch i mentioned was called red oktober instead of october
👍: 0 ⏩: 0