Comments: 26
SgianDubh [2013-11-23 12:47:14 +0000 UTC]
Just beautiful. Love this little waterdrop on the petal
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Werewoofwoof [2013-11-16 17:08:13 +0000 UTC]
Very pretty image, hun! :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sofiafarhan [2013-04-19 03:34:59 +0000 UTC]
awesome !!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sofiafarhan In reply to dwsel [2013-05-04 11:49:02 +0000 UTC]
u r welcome !! loved ur work
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
slepalex [2013-03-14 10:31:54 +0000 UTC]
An impressive result! It looks like a photo.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dwsel In reply to slepalex [2013-03-20 12:08:26 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! I also like it a lot - I think that just tiny steps add to realism, some postpro to add camera imperfections we all used too see on photos, etc.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sed [2012-09-04 15:26:58 +0000 UTC]
PURDY!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
davidbrinnen [2012-09-01 07:10:54 +0000 UTC]
Good use of DOF, the colour saturation for the scene is excellent, I don't see any noise from the DOF, is that down to scaling or softening from GIMP?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dwsel In reply to davidbrinnen [2012-09-02 00:13:24 +0000 UTC]
The noise was terrible, especially on the trees. The image is rendered only with 16 samples/px. I used 3 blurred layers (blur, blur more, gaussian blur 4) and painted their transparency masks in places with noise, being careful not to destroy any sharp edges from original.
I started working very late on this image, and I wanted to finish before the deadline. The rendering took me sth like 25+ hours, which is quite long considering I had to sacrifice some qualities. For example I had to get rid of partial transparency (5-10%) of the flower (for grass it's still on and it has quite a nice effect on the image), self shadowing of the flower petals and grass clumps, and even excluded flower from the dome light (that's why it has so much contrast and I had to lighten shadows in post).
Saturation was tweaked in post. The original didn't have enough colourization I needed so instead of spending more time on tweaking light or just adding saturation I painted in soft light blending mode some pink, orange, mint green washes.
I uploaded the process/making of: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
davidbrinnen In reply to dwsel [2012-09-02 12:06:34 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for the explanation, and the link, impressive work. I am a bit useless when it comes to paint packages, which is main reason why I try to do everything in Bryce.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
medoo-khfaga [2012-08-31 22:24:43 +0000 UTC]
very nice photo ...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1