HOME | DD

teews666 — God Is Not Great

Published: 2011-05-09 23:58:48 +0000 UTC; Views: 5785; Favourites: 23; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description I recently got The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins and God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything by Christopher Hitchens in audiobook format so that I can listen to them on the iPod if my books are inaccessible to me at the time.

As I've mentioned before on some of my other iTunes CD covers, that I am a bit compulsive about uniformity between my album covers to an almost obsessive level. lol. Hence I made my own.

Link to The God Delusion cover - [link]

Feel free to use them. For personal (noncommercial) use only!
Related content
Comments: 35

shark235 [2016-11-04 04:34:44 +0000 UTC]

That type of god doen't even exist anyway. The real gods(if they exist) may not the ones that monotheism imagines.

www.biblerealitycheck.com/heav…

www.biblerealitycheck.com/Wing…

sites.google.com/site/yahwehel…

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MihTimak [2016-08-26 22:37:14 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I am very glad that I have read this book in my native Russian language.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MunchV [2014-06-08 23:48:15 +0000 UTC]

Glad other people think alike. I always thought the Abrahamic God/Yahweh/Allah was a totalitarian prick and a sadist. How it ordered the Jews to mutilate their babies (child abuse), the destruction of Babel, the deluge, ordering a father to kill his son, casting out Lucifer for questioning his methods, oppression of women, homophobia...

And people are supposed to think god is the good guy? That entity sounds more evil than anything else!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zucca-Xerfantes [2014-04-10 00:54:05 +0000 UTC]

Yanno, for not believing in God, you people sure do talk about Him a lot...

Oh, and Chris Hitchens is a strawmanning, asinine, hyperbole machine. No idea why, when I've had perfectly civil debates with atheists before. Chunkheads like this guy and Dick Dawkins can go fly a kite.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ErnestPeckham In reply to Zucca-Xerfantes [2021-08-01 21:40:02 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bluessaurus [2012-10-21 04:21:47 +0000 UTC]

A really cool book.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LucifericChrist [2012-04-26 23:58:58 +0000 UTC]

This is a great book. I really like chapter 16 "Is religion child abuse?" If it was up to religion we would still believe our earth is the center of the universe and stars nothing more then lanters god but up as an after thought.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JackLeChuck [2012-03-01 14:13:56 +0000 UTC]

Jesus - you guys are pretty stupid but that Marsmar is SHIT-THICK-and-BULGING

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

teews666 In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-01 16:03:05 +0000 UTC]

HA! Nice try, but coming from someone who describes himself as "I'm a 16 yr old bi-sexual, highly intelligent & blah blah blah" you would certainly know plenty about being shit-thick. Honestly, what sort of sad pathetic insecure moron feels the need validate his own intellect? At least try not to undermine your own declaration by posting idiotic irrelevant comments.
You sir, have failed at trolling!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JackLeChuck In reply to teews666 [2012-03-01 17:36:54 +0000 UTC]

I've left a far weightier biog in my first recent entry & tho' I'm new to this art-site I'll make my mark - it's called Rent Me. I have an IQ of 189 like my mother & I've been to two outstanding fee-paying schools, the latter Chandos House was for gifted children. Tho' young I already have good Italian and study Hebrew. I've visited very many countries already - VietNam Egypt ETC - so I will accumulate experience. My late papa was a priest & Theology lecturer at the finest UK university + he was a Harvard grad - hence, I don't take cheek from the common herd & I won't be bullied by scrotes - i.e. - prols who do not hang right.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

teews666 In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-01 18:41:27 +0000 UTC]

Cool story bro!
No seriously, you are hilarious... in a really pathetic way!
What exactly was the point of posting that ridiculous comment? Was I supposed to be impressed or something? If so, you'll have to do a lot better than that nonsensical load of pretentious bullshit.
However, thank you for demonstrating the extent of your evident inferiority complex. For someone who claims to have a high IQ, you sure do a fantastic job of acting like a complete dumbass. lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JackLeChuck In reply to teews666 [2012-03-01 19:12:28 +0000 UTC]

I see no ridiculous comment! I'm sure like most men if you got me alone you'd want me to blow, toss, fist or finger you: and then you'd want to mount me because you cannot control your thing: you are all the same & I know I could have any of you atheists whimpering O GOD! O GOD! very promptly. I'm sure that you and that MarsBar character are a regular pair of Mary-Janes. I could seriously make you stiff in your knickers pronto, because you are all pathetic beasts!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

teews666 In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-01 19:33:49 +0000 UTC]

HAHAHAHA!!!
Just wen I though you couldn't get any more stupid, you outdo yourself!
Oh and nice job generalizing all men you sexist simpleton. Sorry to burst your sexual bubble, but you are definitely not my type.
But hey, don't let that stop your fantasy... after all, it's all you have! LMFAO!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JackLeChuck In reply to teews666 [2012-03-01 19:40:29 +0000 UTC]

Admit you are poor and cross with Jesus for not giving you looks, lots of money and a springy schlong - I have all these, which is HOW I know God loves me immensely. I and God are wonderful & I've even been compared to Jesus but I said NO! NO! that's not possible cuz I'm intelligent and I could NEVER work in a woodshed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

teews666 In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-01 19:46:16 +0000 UTC]

+1Up for stupidity once again! Congratulations!

You do realize that you just called jesus unintelligent and demeaned his supposed profession of carpentry. LOL!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JackLeChuck In reply to teews666 [2012-03-01 20:04:28 +0000 UTC]

Get it right - I meant Jesus is HIGHLY INTELLIGENT tho' compared to me - I mean: we're the aristocracy and He was trade however exalted His later station. Mama would only allow such people 'around the back', although, on occasion, I'd think UP THE BACK was more to my liking - still, if the old darling departs eventually & is rightly promoted to Glory, I'll do very nicely looking around among the servile classes for beautiful youths

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

teews666 In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-01 20:12:29 +0000 UTC]

You sir, have some deep rooted insecurities and issues!
But please don't get professional help, as you wouldn't be nearly half as entertaining if you are now! I don't want to relinquish the dancing monkey just yet.
You comments are literally redefining what it means to be an internet troll!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JackLeChuck In reply to teews666 [2012-03-01 20:31:20 +0000 UTC]

Deep rooted insecurities? Hardly - we've been overlords & rulers for 7 centuries & NO-ONE come revolutions world-wars WHATEVER has ever managed to knock us off our perch. I doubt if your dwelling could house our library [mama sold off 4 Shakespeare's we kept in the knife-and-fork drawer] & my infant comic-collection was minimally 13000 strong [boxes arrive most days & today's are piled on my pillow]. I have a Manet above this particular desk - there are others - and our art gallery is wonderful. My bedroom has Hendrix in tempera, a Japanese battle-scene, a Pierrot-Lunaire, an early Blake poster & countless volumes on Asian Art - Jap Chinese Korean Burmese Tibetan Indian ETC ETC. My cup runneth over because the Lord God KNOWS we love learning and beautiful things.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

teews666 In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-01 20:48:30 +0000 UTC]

Can't argue with crazy, so whatever you say! lol
I know I shouldn't laugh at you for being utterly demented, but the sheer amount of insane garbage you seem to put out of your ass is truly astounding!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JackLeChuck In reply to teews666 [2012-03-01 20:50:23 +0000 UTC]

Pull out of your ass I think you meant to say. So I'm witty as well as devastatingly good-looking - would that you were either, workhouse

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

teews666 In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-01 21:06:04 +0000 UTC]

I didn't say you were witty.
I wasn't laughing at your "witt", but rather at your idiocy! After all this time if you fail to realize that, then you clearly fail at life.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JackLeChuck In reply to teews666 [2012-03-01 21:23:08 +0000 UTC]

Idiocy is fr the Attic Gk adjective: idios meaning someone not subscribing to life in the polis. Christ was called idiotic by Nietzsche - it means private, not subscribing to prevalent or conventional standpoints. I am classically educated & had read most Greek & Romans writers by 12 inc Gibbon's History in its entirety. My papa's Ancient History library mama sold cuz we needed more space but not before I'd read lots of it. The Greeks? Homer Hesiod Herodotus Thucydides Heraclitos Parmenides Zeno & the Eleatics all of Plato all of Aristotle ETC ETC The Romans? you name it - Livy Virgil Sallust - in fact I've visited Sallust's house [still standing in Rome] & only yesterday I discussed the war against Jugurtha by Marius & Sulla at a party with a BBC historian. My educational standard is so far above anything you can imagine/conceive - e.g. my papa read philosophy to me as a child & I came first in a mathematical contest against 300 also-rans
Of course I've lectured to Mensa & at Trinity Oxford. Need more?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

teews666 In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-01 21:40:42 +0000 UTC]

"I've lectured to Mensa"... literally laughing my ass off!
Ahhh, your one man circle jerk is now complete!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JackLeChuck In reply to teews666 [2012-03-01 22:00:06 +0000 UTC]

I lectured to the Birmingham branch on depth psychology in Nietzsche & Freud. The same lecture I repeated [by request] at Trinity Oxford before the Guinness & Faber heirs + selected guests. At the beginning of April I will give a talk on Iconography & Symbolist Art in Broadstairs Kent to several Oxford graduates, headmasters etc. Recently I went to Turin to talk about the Art of Jim Overbeck. Do you want me to give you a critique of Goedel's Theorem 1931 on line?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

teews666 In reply to JackLeChuck [2012-03-01 22:19:27 +0000 UTC]

No, I do not want your so called critique. However, what I would like is for you to stop lurking on the internet and spamming my page with pointless rubbish that is entirely unrelated to the image and the resulting conversation.
I'll admit it was amusing at first to see you harp on like a moron, but it's becoming annoying really fast. Do you really have that little to occupy yourself with? Get a hobby... perhaps try masturbating! That should be easy enough, even for someone like you.

The joke has run it course I'm afraid. Now you simply bore me, sir. Good day!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JackLeChuck In reply to teews666 [2012-03-01 22:21:11 +0000 UTC]

weep

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Falconicide [2012-01-11 10:22:55 +0000 UTC]

I have personal experience. Religion ruined my whole families life.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

swfan444 [2011-09-27 19:18:44 +0000 UTC]

Well, I'm an atheist too, and I say good on you for reading/listening to such awesome books. I finished reading the God Delusion the other day, it's brilliant, isn't it? Dawkins is a genius.
Religious trolls like the ones who have already commented on this really annoy me. It's best not to take them too seriously because all they are really interested in is insulting people. Kudos for not allowing them to provoke you! They really aren't worth it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

haseebjkhan [2011-07-17 17:40:52 +0000 UTC]

Get your mom here, i have my rod ready to tear apart her cunt, so she can birth you a bloody son of a satan, and then you put a vacum dick enlarger at an earlier age to make him you penis God, and then worship him like your crazy bitch,

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

teews666 In reply to haseebjkhan [2011-07-18 22:44:14 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

haseebjkhan In reply to teews666 [2011-07-18 22:48:33 +0000 UTC]

Fuk off zionist satanist, will see you in the abyss of fire...

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

AkselAkkale In reply to haseebjkhan [2011-08-14 16:47:00 +0000 UTC]

hehe funny

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

teews666 In reply to haseebjkhan [2011-07-18 22:54:02 +0000 UTC]

Obvious troll is obvious!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

angelobelmont [2011-06-14 05:02:38 +0000 UTC]

Atheists are certainly paranoid creatures aren't they?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

teews666 In reply to angelobelmont [2011-06-14 15:08:06 +0000 UTC]

If you say so.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0