HOME | DD

yoult β€” This is NOT Megalodon

Published: 2013-08-06 18:27:27 +0000 UTC; Views: 2162; Favourites: 69; Downloads: 4
Redirect to original
Description and therefore not interesting.

What's wrong? Why do you contuine reading? Haven't you read that this is not Megalodon, the only Shark despite the Great White which is important or interesting? Even if it is extinct for several million ye... oh what? You heard that chances are high, that Megalodon is still alive? ... Discovery Channel?!

Ok.

People who are actually interested in Sharks can contuine reading. All others: LEAVE! LEAVE AND GO TO YOUR MERMAIDS, MEGALODONS AND GIANT SPINOZILLAS!

This is the Common Thresher (Alopias vulpinus), the largest member of its Genus with lengths up to 6 m (20 ft). About half of its length consists of the elongated upper lobe of its caudal fin.
It can be found both close to the shore and and in the open ocean, from the surface to a depth of 550 m (1,800 ft).
It uses its long tail in a whip-like fashion to deliver incapacitating blows to its prey.
This animal is highly valued by commercial fishers for its meat, fins, hide, and liver oil; large numbers are taken by longline and gillnet fisheries throughout its range. It is also esteemed by recreational anglers for the exceptional fight it offers on hook-and-line.
The common thresher has a low rate of reproduction and cannot withstand heavy fishing pressure for long, which is exemplified by the rapid collapse of the thresher shark fishery off California in the 1980s. With commercial exploitation increasing in many parts of the world, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has assessed this species as Vulnerable. Read more on the Wikipedia Article...

You see, while being no threat to humans it suffers heavily from them.
If once highly renowned documentary channels just only crave for sensationalism of the most unscientific kind, how should the Everyman, who isn't as specialized in Nature Preservation like others, be informed about the hazard animals, which are rather unknown in the public, are exposed to?
Discovery Channel'S Shark Week is a disgrace for those animals.
Related content
Comments: 27

Braindroppings1 [2017-12-17 14:21:59 +0000 UTC]

I agree 100% with you.
I certainly would have preferred the Discovery Channel make a documentary actually meant to educate on vulnerable shark species, rather than create a "documentary" depicting an extinct species to still be alive and with some of the most unconvincing photoshopped images. That aside, the common thresher is a pretty interesting species of shark, one which I'd really love to learn more about. But, nope, they had to go with conspiracy theories...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PCAwesomeness [2015-11-17 04:22:09 +0000 UTC]

What IS wrong with threshers?Β 

I think they're kinda cool.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

acepredator [2015-11-17 04:11:07 +0000 UTC]

There used to be a giant thresher shark about the mass of a great white.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Smashndash [2015-04-25 09:22:31 +0000 UTC]

'the only Shark despite the Great White which is important or interesting?' Actually, there is the Cretoxyrhina aka Ginsu shark, which is nearly identical to the Great White, only slightly bigger

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GeneticHybridHuman [2015-01-26 12:52:50 +0000 UTC]

I find the Thresher very interesting. I like how it uses its long tail as a whip and when it cracks it stuns its prey, giving it time to go for the kill.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Saurophagus [2013-09-13 19:42:20 +0000 UTC]

I like thresher sharks. They're very unique.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RickCharlesOfficial [2013-08-11 21:30:07 +0000 UTC]

Amen.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Nesihonsu [2013-08-10 18:17:56 +0000 UTC]

WellΒ all species are equal but some are more equal than others.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Orionide5 [2013-08-07 19:13:33 +0000 UTC]

I thought Shark Week was about shark awareness... In any case this is one of my favorite sharks; it's cool how it herds fish with its tail.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

acepredator In reply to Orionide5 [2014-11-23 22:42:44 +0000 UTC]

The tail is actually used as a giant sword, not to herd prey.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

VigorousNebulaDragon [2013-08-07 13:24:43 +0000 UTC]

Both Animal Planet and Discovery Channel these days have no single contribution into wildlife education nor conservation. These guys have either lost their brain or had no idea what do these channels stand for when they were first founded. Shame huh?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

titanlizard [2013-08-07 11:03:54 +0000 UTC]

It is terrible that the shark week is only about the great white and megalodon. What about the many other sharks? And other prehistoric sharks were as big as the megalodon (Parahelicoprion).

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

acepredator In reply to titanlizard [2014-11-23 22:43:11 +0000 UTC]

Sorry, Parahelicoprion had been debunked (largest Paleozoic predator though!)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

E-Smaniotto [2013-08-07 10:25:59 +0000 UTC]

Pure poetry

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

commander-salamander [2013-08-07 03:55:22 +0000 UTC]

Nah not interested. Where is teh sex?

JK

I recently read about the amazing tail smacking that threshers give out and it is awesome.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Excalibur-T005 [2013-08-06 23:31:28 +0000 UTC]

Threshers have always been some of my favourite sharks, probably, to start with, just because of how ridiculously oversized that caudal fin looks. That fossilized thresher teeth are fairly cool-looking, and the bigeye thresher displays hints of a rather advanced thermoregulatory system, just makes it better, of course, but the tail-as-weapon adaptation is good enough by itself.


That Discovery would elect to ignore fascinating sharks like this one - or even extinct beasts like Edestus and Helicoprion - to feed the public sensationalist cryptozoo BS about a species that, in their eyes, appears to be just an easier way to cash in on the lingering fascinated paranoia first fueled by Jaws says a lot about the state of television at this time. If some of the things I've heard about National Geographic lately are true, then PBS might be the only channel with any integrity left.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Tyrannotitan333 [2013-08-06 23:06:06 +0000 UTC]

Wow, you nailed this perfectly!

Β 

Also, don't forget the two brained Sauroposeidons at Discovery.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PeteriDish [2013-08-06 21:16:35 +0000 UTC]

ypu win internetz for that description XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ornitholestes1 [2013-08-06 21:04:50 +0000 UTC]

Hey, it's a megalodon!


πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kartracer57 [2013-08-06 19:19:56 +0000 UTC]

You heard the news, too, huh?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yoult In reply to kartracer57 [2013-08-06 21:35:40 +0000 UTC]

It's everywhere.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

kartracer57 In reply to yoult [2013-08-07 01:41:45 +0000 UTC]

Of course it is. Maybe it's not Megalodon, but a similarly-sized descendant. Of course it IS possible that it could be Megalodon. Only time and research will tell.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

NihilWraith In reply to kartracer57 [2013-08-12 04:19:59 +0000 UTC]

...
I'm sorry, what?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

kartracer57 In reply to NihilWraith [2013-08-12 04:56:03 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I mean, it may not be THE Megalodon, but a descendant of the species that's similar in size.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

NihilWraith In reply to kartracer57 [2013-09-19 01:37:47 +0000 UTC]

The... the uh... documentary wasn't real. You know that, right?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

kartracer57 In reply to NihilWraith [2013-09-19 20:57:50 +0000 UTC]

I didn't find out until after I sent that message. I'm fully aware.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

electreel [2013-08-06 19:03:50 +0000 UTC]

Nice drawing and wise words. Discovery Channel has always aimed towards sensationalism rather than intellectualism, anyway. Sadly other doc-related channels are following in its footsteps.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0