Comments: 68
Aquasakura [2009-06-18 16:42:17 +0000 UTC]
Cool picture! The colour of the flower looks preaty. I never heard of the program called "Art Range" before.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
nycterent [2009-05-22 00:14:22 +0000 UTC]
I saw this on your page and thought - I see a person falling into the petals, and then wondered if it was my overactive imagination again. Nope, the title proves it. My other thought was more phoenix-like, of something burning up. Flare-and-gone.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
nycterent In reply to msklystron [2009-05-22 19:09:25 +0000 UTC]
I think the title works perfectly, to be honest. My take on titles is that they should influence the interpretation, or at least guide the reader. The only other alternative that comes to me is "impact" but that's probably too violent to be appropriate. =]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
henshell [2008-09-06 17:15:31 +0000 UTC]
ooh. this is beautiful. must have took a long time to make. what program did you use.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
chugglepuff In reply to msklystron [2008-08-08 22:59:54 +0000 UTC]
I think that style would work well for an Impressionist sort of piece... strong brush strokes and bold colours mixing into each other. *muses for some time*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oleem [2008-08-06 19:00:09 +0000 UTC]
I'm impressed. It looks like it was painted traditionally! Lovely movement and colours, though I don't see a landing...I see a transformation from girl to flower [or vice versa?]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
msklystron In reply to Oleem [2008-08-06 19:59:18 +0000 UTC]
Thanks!!! I think you might enjoy this program. It's free too!
Hmmm... transformation... This is why I enjoy putting my work out there. Interpretations such as yours force me to take a second look at my own work. I can definitely see how it could be a transformation. Girl to flower, I think. When I was painting it I smeared away parts of the girl intentionally (namely, her visible arm) not worrying about the anatomy I'd carefully sketched in.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oleem In reply to msklystron [2008-08-07 15:36:44 +0000 UTC]
Maybe. It does look interesting, but I have only a limited time with the computer so I'll probably just stick to doing art traditionally.
Other interpretations are always interesting. I'm amazed by the capacity other people have to understand things that aren't on the surface.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
msklystron In reply to calicokatt [2008-08-05 17:43:18 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! The program has such a painterly feel to it that this is what came out. It has a soft 'brush' that loads paint for fairly realistic strokes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kzeor [2008-08-03 23:50:49 +0000 UTC]
I like it and how you really have captured the movement. I will check out art rage.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheKinkyShrink [2008-08-03 18:41:58 +0000 UTC]
I'm wowed yet again. Great work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TheKinkyShrink In reply to msklystron [2008-08-03 20:52:15 +0000 UTC]
No blushing allowed!
You have amazing talent and you should know it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
meish [2008-08-03 11:10:13 +0000 UTC]
Cool picture. Very unique.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>