Comments: 76
Paulthored [2020-01-19 01:14:09 +0000 UTC]
If there is no GOD, then there is no objective standard for morality.
Because then the only source for moral values is humanity at large.
Evolution doesn't give a Fuck, Science even less so.
The only standards for morality would be made up subjective standards. Standards which would change so often, as to be effectively meaningless.
It would be a History is written by the Victor's, scenario. Applied to moral standards.
If the standards are of Rome, then it would be morally acceptable to blame the woman for being raped, sodomy of young boys for sexual pleasure, and goat's would be acceptable to fuck.
If we were in the countries surrounding ancient Israel... Crimes against Property would be heavily punished, while rape would be a simple fine if even that. Babies would be acceptable sacrifices via frying them to Death in public spectacle. Slaves may be a major part of the economy, with wars started whenever the supplies ran low. Beating your family would be expected, up to a point.
If Hitler had won... Well, you get the idea.
If we were lacking in the objective, unchanged, & permanent standard of morality provided by God, we wouldn't have any real moral standards.
π: 0 β©: 1
Paulthored In reply to BlackJill [2020-02-03 23:56:21 +0000 UTC]
If, "All morality is subjective."Β Then all morality is meaningless.
There is no other possible outcome, that is also Logically sound, from that position on morality.Β
Because then ever standard of morality is objectively the same value. it is all baseless opinion.
I don't want to live in a world where every person i meet could have a different opinion of the morality of...
Β Β Murder, for example. And that I'd have no guarantee of that opinion being the same the next time we met.
The way in which we form our Personal ethical standards might be subjective to a degree...
Β Β Because then all those people claiming that Children are inherently Good, are definitely wrong.
But even if there is SOME subjectivity to personal/societal ethical standards, there is Still an Objective Moral Standard.Β
After all, "We hold these Truths to be self evident..." can't exist in a world with no Objective Moral Truth.
Β Β And they Reiterated this, when they held theΒ Nuremberg trials. The prosecutors realized that they Couldn't convict the soldiers, based on subjective moral standards. They couldn't tell them that what they did was wrong, when they were following the orders of their country, if they couldn't also say that what they did was objectively wrong.
π: 0 β©: 2
Paulthored In reply to Paulthored [2020-02-07 00:03:50 +0000 UTC]
Edit: I meant God/Religion neutral... Not necessarily removing any/all such subtext from the discussion.
Sorry.
Btw , do you happen to know how to edit these things, on the new eclipse version??
π: 0 β©: 0
dudiho [2019-08-24 20:44:18 +0000 UTC]
Even Adolf Hitler was morally superior to the Jews.
π: 0 β©: 1
SpookWriter [2017-11-22 06:09:17 +0000 UTC]
Why isn't it the absence of morality?
π: 0 β©: 1
Xenomaster In reply to SpookWriter [2018-12-08 23:27:58 +0000 UTC]
Because you can come to the conclusion without divine intervention. Heck, you can come to it in the face of religion. Have you or has anyone you known worked on the weekend?
π: 0 β©: 1
Xenomaster In reply to SpookWriter [2018-12-10 09:40:06 +0000 UTC]
So we should stone you to death?
π: 0 β©: 1
SpookWriter In reply to Xenomaster [2018-12-12 04:12:40 +0000 UTC]
I don't know how those two things relate but I'll dab on it anyways
π: 0 β©: 1
SpookWriter In reply to Xenomaster [2018-12-13 04:09:56 +0000 UTC]
You're taking that out of context
π: 1 β©: 2
Paulthored In reply to SpookWriter [2020-01-27 23:04:01 +0000 UTC]
The Context is the time period and circumstances of Ancient Israel.
ya know, the times periods when their neighbors regularly Braised Babies Alive in public spectacle...
or Boiled them in Breast-milk...
or went to War, because the decline in the local slave population was causing an economic downturn...
Or any of thousand and one Other horrible things done as daily/weekly practice by people the world over(or even just in the local Middle East) at the time this was written.
We've had almost Three Thousand years since then...
Just because we find fault with it now, doesn't mean it wasn't Progressive back then.
π: 0 β©: 0
Xenomaster In reply to SpookWriter [2018-12-13 09:16:37 +0000 UTC]
Really, then what is the context? BecauseΒ Numbers 15:31 and 37 are nothing to do with 32-26. No "this is what Lucifer would say" or "JK Lol".
π: 0 β©: 1
Xenomaster In reply to SpookWriter [2018-12-14 10:12:14 +0000 UTC]
I don't need to, you moron. The Sabbath is mentioned only in 32, before and after those verses are different subjects and there is literally nothing added to the rule to mean other than "kill who works on the sabbath". If a politician endorses eating babies, it doesn't matter what else they say, they want to eat babies!
π: 0 β©: 1
SpookWriter In reply to Xenomaster [2018-12-25 04:05:55 +0000 UTC]
IDK tbh babies are pretty good
π: 0 β©: 1
SpookWriter In reply to Xenomaster [2019-01-10 05:04:33 +0000 UTC]
I think I'm gonna go eat some baby back ribs
π: 0 β©: 0
MadKingFroggy [2016-03-29 10:30:01 +0000 UTC]
If an omnipotent, omnipresent God exists, then He is the most immoral creature in the world, and likely a sadist by the looks of things.
Or He's negligent and just abandoned us since He created us.
Or more likely, He doesn't exist in the first place.
π: 0 β©: 0
Linkzilla [2015-10-02 06:40:21 +0000 UTC]
The EXISTENCE of God, is the REJECTION of Morality
π: 0 β©: 1
Green-Tea-Flower [2015-09-20 04:13:05 +0000 UTC]
One day Atheists will be the worldwide majority...START LIKING IT!!
π: 0 β©: 1
SpookWriter In reply to Green-Tea-Flower [2017-11-27 20:45:13 +0000 UTC]
Wow. Quora, Real Clear World, and YouTube? Since when were they credible sources?
π: 1 β©: 1
Xenomaster In reply to SpookWriter [2018-12-10 09:39:47 +0000 UTC]
Not even related to what I said
π: 0 β©: 1
SpookWriter In reply to Xenomaster [2018-12-13 04:09:22 +0000 UTC]
Dude it's fricken necropost
π: 0 β©: 1
Xenomaster In reply to SpookWriter [2018-12-13 09:16:54 +0000 UTC]
You keep assuming I know what that means
π: 0 β©: 1
AlterEgoAndie [2015-05-25 13:46:33 +0000 UTC]
Yes! Yes, yes, !!!! Morality knows all people, regardless of gender, religion, race, creed, age, body type, mind & sexuality. What this person's basically saying is this: Morals were around before religion, and if ya can't accept it, well too bad! It's the truth!
π: 1 β©: 0
Linkzilla [2014-12-14 07:09:33 +0000 UTC]
The Presence of God is the Absence of Morality.
π: 0 β©: 0
selfmadecannibal [2014-09-06 21:24:08 +0000 UTC]
I'm a Christian and it always bothers me when other Christians say things like "there's no reason to be moral without God" and stuff like that. Β
π: 0 β©: 1
GoshiDoll [2014-08-01 14:34:32 +0000 UTC]
True.
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>