HOME | DD

BlackJill β€” Morals

Published: 2013-10-22 21:36:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 2521; Favourites: 120; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description I'm so sick of hearing people tell me that because I'm not religious or because I don't believe in God that somehow I have no morals, or that I don't believe in anything.

When the fuck did religion, especially the Abrahamic religions (Abrahamic religions ), become the origin of morality? And since when did religion define morality?

Morality begins when a society begins forming ideas and principles on what is right or wrong, and I'm pretty certain these concepts predate organized religion. In fact, I'm also pretty certain these concepts even predate homosapiens and exist in primates, such as the Bonobo Chimpanzees. Although they don't exhibit morals in the human sense, they have and still exhibit strong traits that lead to the evolution of morality in humans. Their social contruct was passed on to the first homosapien, and from there not only was there a biological evolution, but a psychological one as well.

I'm pretty sure primates weren't going around door to door pimping God/religion out to any poor schmuck who had the misfortune of opening his/her door before realizing what was really on his/her doorstep, and I'm pretty sure the first homosapiens weren't doing that either. While the actual idea/concepts of right and wrong were evolving in the first humans, the idea of religion didn't yet exist. Yes, while early humans did exhibit signs of ritual burials, there's no evidence that these were religious rituals to any deity, but could just as well have been that once they'd contructed communities, there was a greater emotional attachment to the deceased and began burying or burning their dead rather than leave their bodies to be fed upon by wild animals. You also have to take into account that because humans began living in communities, they were more likely to pass on whilst still within that community and the smell of a decomposing body would also attract wild animals.

Yes, later on religious ideas began playing a large role in our burial ritual when we began wondering where the soul went after departing from the body, and thus the concepts of an afterlife came into being and thus questions of origin and purpose spurred on the idea of God(s).

As communities began to grow larger, it would also begin to be that much more difficult to control such a large number of people. If no one person or organization can enforce morality in a community, or even an entire society, since that one person or organization would be much smaller than the whole of the society, you need something much larger. Thus religion was invented. It was the idea that if you did wrong, some God would come down and punish you, and if you did good you would be rewarded, especially after you die.

Of course, people fear the finality of death, so many are willing to believe anything so long as they're promised a continuuity of their self awareness after death. They don't want, or simply can't, accept that after death, that's it. There's no waking up. There's nothing. So it was easy to get people to believe in the idea of a heaven, hell and purgatory.

With that being said, religion is not the origin of morality, but rather quite the opposite.

Religion is the result of morality. The idea of what is right or wrong would have to have existed prior to the idea of religion, which was used to enforced those moralities on a much greater scale.

And so...

Apes evolved into humans.

Humans began forming groups.

Those groups became small communities.

A greater attachment and respect for members of their community lead to the idea of burial, even ritual burial, and also to avoid attracting wild animals and disease.

These rituals lead to questioning the afterlife and who or what created it.

Said questions lead to the idea of (a) greater being(s), or rather the idea of origin.

Origin lead to religion.

Religion became law.

These laws lead to wars and discrimination between different religions and/or non-religious since different societies had different ideas of what origin was, and thus lead to different religions.

We came to the realization that the problem was that people abused religion and religion abused laws.

So we invented human rights.

These new laws and rights conflicted with religious doctrine.

So we seperated law and government from religion.

Religion β‰  law. It can no longer make any decisions that would affect government and/or law.

Religion is pretty miffed.

Religion decides that it can pay attention to a single part of its own doctrine but ignore the rest at its own convenience but fuck the rest of the world because they decided that God hates a certain group of people and the rest of the world needs to obey.

The rest of the world decides religion can go fuck itself.

Religion does not define morality because religion did not make morality. If religion had invented morality, there wouldn't be such a variety of religion to begin with. What sort of God would let his plebeians cheat on him/her/it with another God(dess)?



These are just my five cents, my opinions, most of which are actually factual. I could be wrong on any of my above points and I'm not above being corrected. That being said, if you're going to correct me on anything, you better have evidence to back up your statements, and said evidence better be more than just your preaching, personal experience, what your mommy and daddy told you, a website you saw, what your preacher said, etc etc etc.

Give me actual facts that come with links to supporting material.

Just some links for you to look at that actually relate to the topic above. I'll likely post more later.

History of burials.

Origin of morality.
Related content
Comments: 76

Paulthored [2020-01-19 01:14:09 +0000 UTC]

If there is no GOD, then there is no objective standard for morality.

Because then the only source for moral values is humanity at large.
Evolution doesn't give a Fuck, Science even less so.

The only standards for morality would be made up subjective standards. Standards which would change so often, as to be effectively meaningless.
It would be a History is written by the Victor's, scenario. Applied to moral standards.

If the standards are of Rome, then it would be morally acceptable to blame the woman for being raped, sodomy of young boys for sexual pleasure, and goat's would be acceptable to fuck.
If we were in the countries surrounding ancient Israel... Crimes against Property would be heavily punished, while rape would be a simple fine if even that. Babies would be acceptable sacrifices via frying them to Death in public spectacle. Slaves may be a major part of the economy, with wars started whenever the supplies ran low. Beating your family would be expected, up to a point.
If Hitler had won... Well, you get the idea.

If we were lacking in the objective, unchanged, & permanent standard of morality provided by God, we wouldn't have any real moral standards.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

BlackJill In reply to Paulthored [2020-02-02 23:21:35 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Paulthored In reply to BlackJill [2021-07-01 23:18:50 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Paulthored In reply to BlackJill [2020-02-03 23:56:21 +0000 UTC]

If, "All morality is subjective."Β Then all morality is meaningless.

There is no other possible outcome, that is also Logically sound, from that position on morality.Β 
Because then ever standard of morality is objectively the same value. it is all baseless opinion.

I don't want to live in a world where every person i meet could have a different opinion of the morality of...
Β  Β Murder, for example. And that I'd have no guarantee of that opinion being the same the next time we met.

The way in which we form our Personal ethical standards might be subjective to a degree...
Β  Β Because then all those people claiming that Children are inherently Good, are definitely wrong.
But even if there is SOME subjectivity to personal/societal ethical standards, there is Still an Objective Moral Standard.Β 

After all, "We hold these Truths to be self evident..." can't exist in a world with no Objective Moral Truth.
Β  Β And they Reiterated this, when they held theΒ Nuremberg trials. The prosecutors realized that they Couldn't convict the soldiers, based on subjective moral standards. They couldn't tell them that what they did was wrong, when they were following the orders of their country, if they couldn't also say that what they did was objectively wrong.


πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

BlackJill In reply to Paulthored [2020-02-05 00:38:04 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BlackJill In reply to Paulthored [2020-02-05 00:18:50 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Paulthored In reply to BlackJill [2020-02-06 23:46:39 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Paulthored In reply to Paulthored [2020-02-07 00:03:50 +0000 UTC]

Edit: I meant God/Religion neutral... Not necessarily removing any/all such subtext from the discussion.
Sorry.
Btw , do you happen to know how to edit these things, on the new eclipse version??

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

dudiho [2019-08-24 20:44:18 +0000 UTC]

Even Adolf Hitler was morally superior to the Jews.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Paulthored In reply to dudiho [2020-01-27 22:52:18 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dudiho In reply to Paulthored [2020-01-27 23:46:40 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

Paulthored In reply to dudiho [2021-07-01 23:19:38 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

SpookWriter [2017-11-22 06:09:17 +0000 UTC]

Why isn't it the absence of morality?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Xenomaster In reply to SpookWriter [2018-12-08 23:27:58 +0000 UTC]

Because you can come to the conclusion without divine intervention. Heck, you can come to it in the face of religion. Have you or has anyone you known worked on the weekend?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SpookWriter In reply to Xenomaster [2018-12-10 03:45:01 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, me

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Xenomaster In reply to SpookWriter [2018-12-10 09:40:06 +0000 UTC]

So we should stone you to death?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SpookWriter In reply to Xenomaster [2018-12-12 04:12:40 +0000 UTC]

I don't know how those two things relate but I'll dab on it anyways

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SpookWriter In reply to Xenomaster [2018-12-13 04:09:56 +0000 UTC]

You're taking that out of context

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 2

Paulthored In reply to SpookWriter [2020-01-27 23:04:01 +0000 UTC]

The Context is the time period and circumstances of Ancient Israel.


ya know, the times periods when their neighbors regularly Braised Babies Alive in public spectacle...

or Boiled them in Breast-milk...

or went to War, because the decline in the local slave population was causing an economic downturn...

Or any of thousand and one Other horrible things done as daily/weekly practice by people the world over(or even just in the local Middle East) at the time this was written.


We've had almost Three Thousand years since then...

Just because we find fault with it now, doesn't mean it wasn't Progressive back then.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Xenomaster In reply to SpookWriter [2018-12-13 09:16:37 +0000 UTC]

Really, then what is the context? BecauseΒ Numbers 15:31 and 37 are nothing to do with 32-26. No "this is what Lucifer would say" or "JK Lol".

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SpookWriter In reply to Xenomaster [2018-12-14 01:12:08 +0000 UTC]

Recite the whole chapter

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

Xenomaster In reply to SpookWriter [2018-12-14 10:12:14 +0000 UTC]

I don't need to, you moron. The Sabbath is mentioned only in 32, before and after those verses are different subjects and there is literally nothing added to the rule to mean other than "kill who works on the sabbath". If a politician endorses eating babies, it doesn't matter what else they say, they want to eat babies!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SpookWriter In reply to Xenomaster [2018-12-25 04:05:55 +0000 UTC]

IDK tbh babies are pretty good

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Xenomaster In reply to SpookWriter [2018-12-25 09:53:01 +0000 UTC]

You are an idiot

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SpookWriter In reply to Xenomaster [2019-01-10 05:04:33 +0000 UTC]

I think I'm gonna go eat some baby back ribs

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MadKingFroggy [2016-03-29 10:30:01 +0000 UTC]

If an omnipotent, omnipresent God exists, then He is the most immoral creature in the world, and likely a sadist by the looks of things.

Or He's negligent and just abandoned us since He created us.

Or more likely, He doesn't exist in the first place.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Linkzilla [2015-10-02 06:40:21 +0000 UTC]

The EXISTENCE of God, is the REJECTION of Morality

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Paulthored In reply to Linkzilla [2021-07-01 23:20:23 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Green-Tea-Flower [2015-09-20 04:13:05 +0000 UTC]

One day Atheists will be the worldwide majority...START LIKING IT!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SpookWriter In reply to Green-Tea-Flower [2017-11-22 06:09:40 +0000 UTC]

Atheists are dying out worldwide. Sorry.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

Green-Tea-Flower In reply to SpookWriter [2017-11-25 21:13:50 +0000 UTC]

Actually, according to surveys, Atheism is more popular than ever before. Sorry.

www.quora.com/Is-atheism-growi…
www.realclearworld.com/article… !
youtu.be/HIiPDDlwCm0

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SpookWriter In reply to Green-Tea-Flower [2017-11-27 20:45:13 +0000 UTC]

Wow. Quora, Real Clear World, and YouTube? Since when were they credible sources?

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

Xenomaster In reply to SpookWriter [2018-12-08 23:28:20 +0000 UTC]

And your butt is?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SpookWriter In reply to Xenomaster [2018-12-10 03:44:48 +0000 UTC]

Necropost

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

Xenomaster In reply to SpookWriter [2018-12-10 09:39:47 +0000 UTC]

Not even related to what I said

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SpookWriter In reply to Xenomaster [2018-12-12 04:12:54 +0000 UTC]

Necropost

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

Xenomaster In reply to SpookWriter [2018-12-12 09:05:37 +0000 UTC]

Are you trolling?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SpookWriter In reply to Xenomaster [2018-12-13 04:09:22 +0000 UTC]

Dude it's fricken necropost

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Xenomaster In reply to SpookWriter [2018-12-13 09:16:54 +0000 UTC]

You keep assuming I know what that means

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SpookWriter In reply to Xenomaster [2018-12-14 01:11:42 +0000 UTC]

Look it up

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Xenomaster In reply to SpookWriter [2018-12-14 10:12:19 +0000 UTC]

No

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SpookWriter In reply to Xenomaster [2018-12-25 04:05:31 +0000 UTC]

You're hot

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Xenomaster In reply to SpookWriter [2018-12-25 09:53:04 +0000 UTC]

You are an idiot

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

SpookWriter In reply to Xenomaster [2019-01-10 05:03:56 +0000 UTC]

And you're a hottie

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

AlterEgoAndie [2015-05-25 13:46:33 +0000 UTC]

Yes! Yes, yes, !!!! Morality knows all people, regardless of gender, religion, race, creed, age, body type, mind & sexuality. What this person's basically saying is this: Morals were around before religion, and if ya can't accept it, well too bad! It's the truth!

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Linkzilla [2014-12-14 07:09:33 +0000 UTC]

The Presence of God is the Absence of Morality.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

selfmadecannibal [2014-09-06 21:24:08 +0000 UTC]

I'm a Christian and it always bothers me when other Christians say things like "there's no reason to be moral without God" and stuff like that. Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Paulthored In reply to selfmadecannibal [2021-07-01 23:33:16 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GoshiDoll [2014-08-01 14:34:32 +0000 UTC]

True.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>