HOME | DD

KantiaCartography — Our Dear Neighbor

Published: 2012-03-10 01:45:32 +0000 UTC; Views: 2861; Favourites: 47; Downloads: 37
Redirect to original
Description ...
Related content
Comments: 34

erv0erv [2023-08-03 02:56:45 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

bruiser128 [2014-02-26 16:36:23 +0000 UTC]

It is basically Britian entering the Mexican American War.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KantiaCartography In reply to bruiser128 [2014-02-26 23:11:43 +0000 UTC]

Well no, it wasn't thought out even that far. Basically its just a "what if the USA never gained any land west of Louisiana?" map. Its old and not very good.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bruiser128 In reply to KantiaCartography [2014-02-27 03:43:11 +0000 UTC]

Well I thinks it's interesting because without a pacific coast they would have no reason to open up Japan.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KantiaCartography In reply to bruiser128 [2014-02-27 03:51:31 +0000 UTC]

That would be one of the many repercussions. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bruiser128 In reply to KantiaCartography [2014-02-27 12:31:45 +0000 UTC]

Well the only way I can think Texas staying independent nation that reaches to the pacific

is through a much earlier Grand Scheme of the Americas.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KantiaCartography In reply to bruiser128 [2014-02-27 22:51:28 +0000 UTC]

Eh I wasn't thinking much about Texas when I made this map.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bruiser128 In reply to KantiaCartography [2014-02-28 00:12:59 +0000 UTC]

Sorry for bringing it up but it's just that when I read

what you write about Texas, it gives me the impression

that you are a Texan.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KantiaCartography In reply to bruiser128 [2014-02-28 00:34:34 +0000 UTC]

I MOST DEFINITELY AM. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bruiser128 In reply to KantiaCartography [2014-02-28 02:20:25 +0000 UTC]

Well THAT explains a lot.^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KantiaCartography In reply to bruiser128 [2014-02-28 02:41:14 +0000 UTC]

We make maps about what we know and feel the most strongly about, and for me that's Texas.  A lot of people don't like the idea because of Texas's short and hard history of independence.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bruiser128 In reply to KantiaCartography [2014-02-28 02:58:26 +0000 UTC]

Well at least YOUR home state known throughout the wrold.

 Barely any of the world notices Canada, until this guy came on

to the scene www.google.ca/webhp?tab=ww&…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KantiaCartography In reply to bruiser128 [2014-03-01 18:19:57 +0000 UTC]

Obviously Canada is a continent

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bruiser128 In reply to KantiaCartography [2014-03-01 19:05:16 +0000 UTC]

Technically it is the nation above America. 


No offense.

 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KantiaCartography In reply to bruiser128 [2014-03-01 19:17:54 +0000 UTC]

None taken. You just called us "America"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bruiser128 In reply to KantiaCartography [2014-03-01 19:29:57 +0000 UTC]

Well I kind of gotten into the habit of saying Yankees,

do Americans like you find the term offensive?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KantiaCartography In reply to bruiser128 [2014-03-01 19:37:17 +0000 UTC]

Anybody outside of Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine will find it offensive, especially for people like me who live south of the Ohio River. We use it as a term for anybody outside of the former CSA, so calling us Yankees just seems preposterous. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bruiser128 In reply to KantiaCartography [2014-03-01 19:54:13 +0000 UTC]

Well what are the terms used to describe the

different regions of the United States?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KantiaCartography In reply to bruiser128 [2014-03-01 20:05:26 +0000 UTC]

Well its different depending on where you're from. Personally, its like...


New England - Pennsylvania : Yankees

Ohio - Wisconsin : Midwesterners

Delaware - Arizona : Southerners

Kansas - North Dakota : "Boring"

Californians are just Californians

People from like Oregon and Washington are just hippies and tree huggers.

Between California and Colorado gets kinda fuzzy.


👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bruiser128 In reply to KantiaCartography [2014-03-01 21:21:20 +0000 UTC]

Wait I thought people from the Northwestern states were called Cascadians.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KantiaCartography In reply to bruiser128 [2014-03-01 21:55:09 +0000 UTC]

The Cascadian Movement is surprisingly small. Most people living in Washington, Oregon, and Idaho are descended from people who migrated there during the 1880s and don't share the sense of self-identity that the original descendants had. That's how it is in most places. All over the USA, here in Texas, in all parts of the South, California, Cascadia, and Deseret, the population has become so saturated with northerners that the population is slowly becoming more homogeneous and the different sectional nationalities have become weaker. 


Even I, for example, am not descended from the original Texians. There were fewer than 70,000 original Texians and most of there descendants have moved on or lost their self-identity. On my father's side, my family has been here since 1632 when a pare of Frisian brothers traveled to New Amsterdam on a Dutch merchant vessel. Only within the last generation did my family come to Texas. On my mother's side, we have been here only 3 generations. My great grandfather was a part of the Filipino military, and when the Philippines were granted independence from the United States in 1946 he moved to New York.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bruiser128 In reply to KantiaCartography [2014-03-01 22:43:27 +0000 UTC]

Well for my Family History I only know of my Dads side thoroughly.

 My great grand father lived in Montreal Canada before the start of

the first world war and fought for the Canadian Expeditionary force.

 Afterwards he moved to the United Kingdom, and had my Grand Father. 

He fought for Britain during world war two, he thought about moving to 

Canada but my Irish Grand mother did not allow it. In both cases they

 where not at the front lines so they never experienced the horrors of war, 

they just saw the victims. 


So that is how my Dads side of the family is closely connected to Canada

as well as the British isles.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Raubritter [2012-07-21 11:57:51 +0000 UTC]

Well this is how it supposed to be

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Leggurm [2012-03-24 02:14:59 +0000 UTC]

Is this future or Alternative history?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KantiaCartography In reply to Leggurm [2012-03-24 15:51:49 +0000 UTC]

Its alternate history. The Mexican Civil War and French Occupation never happened

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Leggurm In reply to KantiaCartography [2012-03-24 21:00:08 +0000 UTC]

Right, thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mattystereo [2012-03-14 06:44:16 +0000 UTC]

I don't think that Canada could have pushed that far south. The degree of settlement in the Oregon territory at the time of the Anglo-American disputes made it an inevitability that America would have a Pacific Coast. At the most Canada could have taken the majority of Washington State.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KantiaCartography In reply to Mattystereo [2012-03-14 13:35:51 +0000 UTC]

American settlers may have moved to the Oregon territory, but in this timeline the USA made no attempts to claim it and the territory, and all of its settlers,became part of Canada. Same this with many parts of Mexico, where white settlers moved in and became Mexican citizens

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Chrestovenator [2012-03-12 07:45:39 +0000 UTC]

Yessss that is exactly how Canada should look!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KantiaCartography In reply to Chrestovenator [2012-03-12 16:23:41 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, this is about the USA getting screwed over by Mexico and Canada instead of doing the screwing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

QuantumBranching In reply to KantiaCartography [2012-03-16 05:29:53 +0000 UTC]

Since all that was Mexican territory before the US even came into existence, I'm not sure that counts as Mexico screwing us...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KantiaCartography In reply to QuantumBranching [2012-03-16 16:15:51 +0000 UTC]

not to be immature but... Killjoy

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

QuantumBranching In reply to KantiaCartography [2012-03-17 07:06:44 +0000 UTC]

So attributing bad behavior to mexicans is one of your joys?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

QuantumBranching In reply to QuantumBranching [2012-03-17 07:15:38 +0000 UTC]

Ok, I'm sorry - shouldn't pull your leg...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0